Google Pixel 4 vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G: A Detailed Comparison for 2024
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users in 2024, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Pixel 4’s Snapdragon 855, and the 65W charging is a game-changer. While the Pixel 4’s camera is excellent, the 8T+ 5G offers a more well-rounded package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 4 | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October 15 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2019, October 22 | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 147.1 x 68.8 x 8.2 mm (5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | - |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 80.7 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 90Hz, HDR | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1.22µm, no AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | Li-Po 2800 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Clearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | G020M, G020I, GA01188-US, GA01187-US, GA01189-US, GA01191-US, GA01189-US | KB2007 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 640 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -71.5dB / Crosstalk -69.8dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 62h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 79dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 83dB | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 395351 (v8) GeekBench: 2542 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Google Pixel 4
- Compact and pocketable design
- Excellent camera with Google’s computational photography
- Clean and bloatware-free Android experience
- Older Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited battery life compared to newer phones
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 5G chipset
- Incredibly fast 65W charging
- Modern feature set and 5G connectivity
- Larger form factor
- OxygenOS may include some bloatware
- Camera may not match Pixel 4’s computational photography in all scenarios
Display Comparison
The Pixel 4 features a display capable of 423 nits of peak brightness, which is adequate but falls short of modern standards. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, but OnePlus typically prioritizes vibrant, high-refresh-rate panels. The Pixel 4’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a strong OLED panel, but without knowing the 8T+ 5G’s panel type, a direct comparison is difficult. The 8T+ 5G likely benefits from a higher refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, a feature absent on the Pixel 4.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable photo and video capabilities. However, without specific sensor details, a precise comparison is challenging. The Pixel 4 is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s software algorithms to produce stunning images, particularly in low light. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G likely relies more on hardware, but its newer processor allows for faster image processing. The absence of details regarding OIS or lens apertures makes it difficult to assess the 8T+ 5G’s low-light performance relative to the Pixel 4.
Performance
The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+) represents a significant leap over the Pixel 4’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The 865 boasts a newer CPU architecture (Cortex-A77 vs Kryo 485) and a more powerful GPU, resulting in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. While both chips share an octa-core configuration with a similar peak clock speed (2.84 GHz), the architectural improvements in the 865 translate to real-world gains. The 8T+ 5G’s 5G modem is another advantage, offering faster cellular data speeds where available.
Battery Life
The Pixel 4’s endurance rating of 62 hours suggests a moderate battery life, but this is based on older testing methodologies. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 65W wired charging – capable of a full charge in just 39 minutes – is a massive advantage. The Pixel 4’s 18W charging with PD2.0 is comparatively slow. While the Pixel 4 might offer slightly better standby time due to its software optimizations, the 8T+ 5G’s rapid charging mitigates any concerns about battery drain.
Buying Guide
Buy the Google Pixel 4 if you prioritize a compact form factor, Google’s pure Android experience, and a consistently excellent camera, and are willing to accept older hardware and slower charging. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you value performance, incredibly fast charging, and a more modern feature set, even if it means sacrificing the Pixel’s smaller size and software simplicity.