Google Pixel 10 vs Xiaomi 15 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off

Google's Pixel 10 and Xiaomi's 15 Pro represent distinct philosophies in the Android flagship space. The Pixel 10 prioritizes intelligent software and sustained performance, while the Xiaomi 15 Pro aims for outright speed and cutting-edge charging technology. This comparison dissects their core strengths to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing longevity and a seamless software experience, the Google Pixel 10 emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 49:23h battery endurance and optimized Tensor G5 chipset offer a more consistent and worry-free experience. However, power users demanding the absolute fastest performance will find the Xiaomi 15 Pro compelling.

PHONES
Phone Names Google Pixel 10 Xiaomi 15 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 29, 30, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40 , 41, 42, 48, 66, 71, 75 - GK2MP1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - China
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 46, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GK2MP1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA - China
SpeedHSPA, LTE (CA), 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, August 202024, October 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, August 28Available. Released 2024, October 29
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame-
Dimensions152.8 x 72 x 8.6 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.34 in)161.3 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight204 g (7.20 oz)213 g or 219 g (7.51 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 4Shatterproof glass (2024 gen)
Resolution1080 x 2424 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~422 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density)
Size6.3 inches, 94.7 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G5 (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
GPUPowerVR DXT-48-1536Adreno 830
OSAndroid 16, up to 7 major Android upgradesAndroid 15, HyperOS 2
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesSingle-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best TakeLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Triple48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.2", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", PDAF50 MP, f/1.4, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR8K@24/30fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single10.5 MP, f/2.2, 95˚, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2, Display Port, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 55% in 30 minutes 15W wireless (magnetic), Qi2 Reverse wired Bypass charging90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Ion 4970 mAhSi/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh
Misc
ColorsIndigo, Frost, Lemongrass, ObsidianBlack, White, Silver, Green
ModelsGK2MP, GLBW0, GL06624101PNB7C, 2410DPN6CC
Price$ 583.50 / C$ 849.99 / £ 599.00 / € 637.10 / ₹ 68,918About 690 EUR
SAR1.18 W/kg (head)     0.99 W/kg (body)-
SAR EU0.99 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)-
EU LABEL
Battery49:23h endurance, 1000 cycles-
EnergyClass B-
Free fallClass A (270 falls)-
RepairabilityClass B-

Google Pixel 10

  • Exceptional battery life (49:23h endurance)
  • AI-powered features and software optimization
  • Excellent computational photography
  • Bypass charging for battery health

  • Slower charging speeds compared to Xiaomi
  • Potentially less raw processing power for demanding tasks

Xiaomi 15 Pro

  • Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
  • Powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
  • High performance for gaming and demanding apps
  • Likely vibrant and eye-catching display

  • Potentially shorter battery life
  • Aggressive performance may lead to thermal throttling

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 15 Pro and Pixel 10 both feature modern displays, but differ significantly in peak brightness. The Pixel 10 boasts a measured 2030 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While Xiaomi doesn't provide this data, their flagship typically aims for high brightness. Both are likely to utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, maximizing battery efficiency. The Pixel 10's display is likely tuned for color accuracy, aligning with Google's emphasis on realistic image reproduction, while Xiaomi often leans towards more vibrant, saturated colors appealing to a broader audience.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, analysis focuses on processing. Google’s Pixel line is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging the Tensor G5’s AI capabilities to produce stunning images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Xiaomi typically focuses on hardware, often employing large sensors and advanced optics. The Pixel 10’s image processing will likely prioritize natural-looking results, while Xiaomi’s may favor more vibrant and contrasty images. The absence of a dedicated telephoto lens specification on either device suggests reliance on digital zoom or software-based solutions.

Performance

The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 15 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB) with its Oryon V2 Phoenix cores (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz) is geared towards maximum throughput, likely delivering superior benchmark scores. However, the Google Tensor G5 (3nm) takes a different approach. Its octa-core configuration (1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520) is optimized for AI and machine learning tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. The 3nm fabrication process for both chips promises improved efficiency, but the Snapdragon’s higher clock speeds suggest a more aggressive performance profile, potentially leading to more thermal throttling under sustained load. Both devices will likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but Xiaomi's aggressive cooling solutions may allow it to maintain peak performance for longer.

Battery Life

Battery life is where the Pixel 10 truly shines. Its 49:23h endurance rating is exceptional, indicating it can easily last through a full day of heavy use. The Xiaomi 15 Pro, while offering impressive 90W wired charging (fully charging in under 40 minutes, estimated) and 50W wireless charging, likely sacrifices some endurance for performance. The Pixel 10’s 30W wired charging with PD3.0/PPS and 15W magnetic wireless charging (Qi2) are slower, but the significantly longer battery life mitigates this. The Pixel 10 also offers reverse wired charging and bypass charging, adding convenience for users with compatible accessories.

Buying Guide

Buy the Google Pixel 10 if you need a phone that lasts all day and beyond, excels in computational photography, and offers a clean, AI-powered Android experience. Buy the Xiaomi 15 Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding games and applications, and value the fastest possible wired and wireless charging speeds.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Google Tensor G5 chip overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Tensor G5 is designed with thermal efficiency in mind, leveraging its 3nm process. While it may not match the peak performance of the Snapdragon 8 Elite, it's less prone to significant throttling during prolonged gaming. Google's software optimization also plays a role in managing heat.
❓ How does the 90W charging on the Xiaomi 15 Pro affect long-term battery health?
While 90W charging is incredibly fast, it can generate more heat, potentially impacting long-term battery health. Xiaomi likely incorporates charging algorithms to mitigate this, but the Pixel 10’s slower charging and bypass charging feature offer a more conservative approach to battery preservation.
❓ What are the benefits of Qi2 wireless charging on the Pixel 10?
Qi2 is the latest wireless charging standard, offering improved efficiency and alignment compared to older Qi standards. This translates to faster wireless charging speeds and reduced energy waste on the Pixel 10.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds between the Snapdragon 8 Elite and Tensor G5 directly proportional to real-world performance gains?
Not necessarily. While the Snapdragon 8 Elite has higher clock speeds, the Tensor G5’s architecture and AI capabilities are optimized for specific tasks. Real-world performance depends on the application; the Snapdragon will excel in raw processing, while the Tensor will shine in AI-driven features.