Pixel 10 Pro XL vs. Oppo Find X8 Pro: The Ultimate Android Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Find X8 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 10 Pro XL, despite the latter’s brighter display and software advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Google Pixel 10 Pro XL | Oppo Find X8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 29, 30, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71, 75 - G45RY | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 30, 38, 40, 46, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G45RY | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 20 | 2024, October 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 28 | Available. Released 2024, October 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.3 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.39 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 232 g (8.18 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~486 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2200 nits (HBM), 3300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 & 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Google Tensor G5 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Immortalis-G925 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades | Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/1.7, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", dual pixel PDAF, | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps (via cloud-based upscaling), 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 42 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 70% in 30 min 25W wireless (magnetic), Qi2 Reverse wired Bypass charging | 80W wired, PD 55W, PPS, UFCS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5200 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5910 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonstone, Jade, Porcelain, Obsidian | Space Black, Pearl White, Blue |
| Models | G45RY, GUL82, GYPW4 | CPH2659, PKC110, PKC130 |
| Price | $ 749.90 / C$ 1,329.99 / £ 999.00 / € 1,059.99 / ₹ 118,299 | € 1,014.99 / $ 1,349.00 / ₹ 92,990 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:39h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- Superior software integration with Google services
- Long-term software support and updates
- Slower charging speeds
- Potentially lower sustained performance compared to Dimensity 9400
Oppo Find X8 Pro
- Faster charging with 80W wired and 50W wireless
- Potentially higher sustained performance with Dimensity 9400
- Longer battery life in active use
- Less bright display
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
Display Comparison
The Pixel 10 Pro XL boasts a significantly brighter display at 2340 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo Find X8 Pro’s 1333 nits. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the Pixel’s peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor users. The impact of color accuracy and panel calibration isn’t specified, but Google’s history suggests a focus on natural color reproduction, while Oppo often leans towards more vibrant settings.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s ISP capabilities are critical. Google’s Tensor chips are renowned for computational photography, excelling in dynamic range and low-light performance. Oppo’s camera systems often focus on hardware advancements, such as large sensors and advanced optics. The absence of sensor size data makes it difficult to determine a clear winner, but Google’s software processing is a significant advantage. We can assume both will offer excellent image quality, but with different strengths – Google leaning towards software-driven realism, and Oppo towards hardware-enhanced detail.
Performance
Both devices leverage 3nm chipsets, but the architectures differ. The Oppo Find X8 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400 features a Cortex-X925 prime core alongside three Cortex-X4 cores, suggesting a focus on sustained peak performance. The Pixel 10 Pro XL’s Google Tensor G5 utilizes a Cortex-X4 prime core and five Cortex-A725 cores, potentially prioritizing AI tasks and efficiency. The Dimensity 9400’s three X4 cores versus the Pixel’s one could translate to better multi-core performance. Thermal management will be crucial; the Dimensity 9400’s higher clock speeds may necessitate a more robust cooling solution to avoid throttling.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X8 Pro’s active use score of 15:18h surpasses the Pixel 10 Pro XL’s 12:29h, indicating superior battery life in real-world scenarios. This is likely due to a combination of chipset efficiency and optimized software. While the Pixel 10 Pro XL offers 1000 charge cycles, suggesting longevity, the Find X8 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 80W wired versus 45W on the Pixel. The Find X8 Pro can reach 70% charge in 30 minutes, while the Pixel takes the same time to reach 70%. The Find X8 Pro also supports 50W wireless charging, exceeding the Pixel’s 25W magnetic Qi2 wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL if you need a seamless software experience deeply integrated with Google’s AI features, prioritize a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and value long-term software support with guaranteed updates. Buy the Oppo Find X8 Pro if you prefer maximum performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and appreciate a more customizable Android experience.