The Gionee P15 Pro and Oppo A55s represent two distinct approaches to the entry-level smartphone market. The Gionee prioritizes affordability, while the Oppo aims for a balance of features and performance. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A55s is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Gionee P15 Pro’s Helio G35, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While the Gionee may be cheaper, the performance gap is significant.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 26. Released 2021, March 29 | 2022, April 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 173.8 x 78.5 x 9.5 mm (6.84 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 163.9 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fjord, Petrol Blue | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2309 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Gionee P15 Pro
- Likely the more affordable option.
- May offer slightly longer battery life due to potentially larger capacity (unconfirmed).
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Oppo A55s.
- Likely to struggle with demanding apps and games.
- Older chipset architecture and less efficient manufacturing process.
Oppo A55s
- Much faster performance thanks to the Dimensity 700 chipset.
- More efficient processor for better battery life under load.
- Smoother multitasking and app responsiveness.
- Slower 10W charging.
- Likely a higher price point than the Gionee P15 Pro.
- May not have a significantly better display.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely utilize LCD panels. The Oppo A55s, being a slightly more premium offering, may benefit from a higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume the display experience will be similar, focusing on functionality over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will heavily depend on the sensor size and image processing. It's probable that the Oppo A55s utilizes a larger primary sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is unlikely on either device, given their price points. The Gionee P15 Pro may include lower-resolution auxiliary cameras (e.g., 2MP macro) that offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference between these two phones. The Oppo A55s’ Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, is a far more capable chipset than the Gionee P15 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G35 (12nm). The Dimensity 700 features a more modern CPU architecture – 2x Cortex-A76 cores alongside 6x Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Gionee’s 4x Cortex-A53 and 4x Cortex-A53 configuration. This translates to a roughly 30-40% performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks for the Oppo. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning the A55s is less likely to throttle under sustained load. Users who play mobile games or frequently multitask will see a dramatic improvement with the Oppo.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Oppo A55s’ 10W wired charging is notably slower than what’s becoming standard even in this price segment. The Gionee P15 Pro’s charging speed is unknown, but a slower charging rate is likely. The Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency may partially offset the slower charging on the Oppo, potentially leading to comparable real-world battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity. Users prioritizing quick top-ups will find the Oppo’s charging speed a drawback.
Buying Guide
Buy the Gionee P15 Pro if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your smartphone usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Oppo A55s if you value a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and future-proofing, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A55s be able to run popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Oppo A55s is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Gionee P15 Pro’s Helio G35.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Oppo A55s a significant drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is relatively slow by today's standards. Expect a full charge to take around 2.5 to 3 hours. However, the Dimensity 700’s power efficiency may mitigate this somewhat, allowing for acceptable battery life despite the slower charging speed.
❓ How much of a performance difference will I notice between the Helio G35 and the Dimensity 700 in everyday tasks?
The difference will be very noticeable. The Dimensity 700 offers a much smoother and more responsive experience when opening apps, browsing the web, and multitasking. The Helio G35 will likely exhibit lag and slowdowns with even moderate usage.
