The Gionee P15 Pro and Motorola Moto G51 5G represent two approaches to the budget 5G smartphone market. The Gionee focuses on providing a functional device at an extremely competitive price, while the Motorola aims for a more balanced experience with a slightly higher price point. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and a more responsive experience, the Motorola Moto G51 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 480+ chipset, built on an 8nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the Gionee P15 Pro’s Helio G35, despite both phones sharing a 124-hour endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia, Saudi Arabia |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe/Asia |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe/Asia |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 26. Released 2021, March 29 | 2021, November 03 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, December 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 173.8 x 78.5 x 9.5 mm (6.84 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) | 170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - Global
or
16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - China only |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired (India)
10W wired (Global) |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fjord, Petrol Blue | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue |
| Models | - | XT2171-2, XT2171-1 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 210 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 124h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1634:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 302859 (v9)
GeekBench: 1696 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 26fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Gionee P15 Pro
- Extremely affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Underpowered Helio G35 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
- Charging speed is unknown
Motorola Moto G51 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster charging (20W in India)
- Slightly higher price than Gionee P15 Pro
- Camera performance likely average
- Global charging speed is only 10W
Display Comparison
Both the Gionee P15 Pro and Motorola Moto G51 5G share a contrast ratio of 1634:1, suggesting similar color reproduction capabilities. However, the Moto G51 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 595 nits. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight, a clear advantage for users who frequently use their phones on the go. While both displays are adequate, the Moto G51 5G’s superior brightness makes it the more versatile option.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the price points, it’s unlikely either phone will excel in image quality. Focusing on the chipset, the Snapdragon 480+ generally offers better image signal processing (ISP) capabilities than the Helio G35, potentially leading to slightly better photos and videos on the Moto G51 5G. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Motorola has a slight edge due to its more advanced chipset.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Motorola Moto G51 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm), featuring a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 core configuration alongside 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 cores. This 8nm process node is more efficient than the 12nm process used in the Gionee P15 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G35. The Helio G35’s CPU, with its 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, will struggle with demanding tasks compared to the Snapdragon 480+. The Snapdragon’s architecture provides a noticeable performance boost in multitasking and app loading times, benefiting users who frequently switch between applications.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Gionee P15 Pro and Motorola Moto G51 5G achieve an endurance rating of 124 hours. This suggests similar battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the Moto G51 5G offers 20W wired charging (in India, 10W globally), while the Gionee P15 Pro’s charging speed is unspecified. The faster charging capability of the Moto G51 5G allows for quicker top-ups, reducing downtime and providing more convenience for users who need to recharge frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Gionee P15 Pro if you need a functional smartphone with 5G connectivity on an absolute shoestring budget and aren't demanding in terms of performance. It's ideal for basic communication and light tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G51 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive user experience, better suited for multitasking, and occasional gaming, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 480+ in the Moto G51 5G handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 480+ can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's significantly more capable than the Helio G35 in the Gionee P15 Pro for gaming.
❓ What is the real-world charging time for the Motorola Moto G51 5G with the 20W charger (India)?
With the 20W charger, the Motorola Moto G51 5G is expected to charge from 0-100% in approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. The 10W global charger will take considerably longer.
❓ Is the camera on either of these phones suitable for taking detailed photos in low light?
Neither phone is expected to perform well in low-light conditions. Both likely rely on software processing to compensate, which can introduce noise and reduce detail. Expect acceptable results only in well-lit environments.
❓ How does the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480+ benefit the Moto G51 5G compared to the 12nm process of the Helio G35?
The 8nm process is more efficient, meaning the Snapdragon 480+ consumes less power for the same level of performance. This translates to better battery life and less heat generation, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use.
