Gionee M12 vs Motorola Moto G9 Power: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Choices

The Gionee M12 and Motorola Moto G9 Power represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. While both aim to deliver essential functionality at a low price, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Gionee M12 offers a potentially lower entry price point, while the Moto G9 Power focuses on maximizing battery life and offering a more modern chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Motorola Moto G9 Power is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset provides a significantly smoother and more responsive experience than either variant of the Gionee M12’s MediaTek processors. While both phones boast excellent battery endurance, the Moto G9 Power’s faster 20W charging is a crucial advantage.

PHONES
Phone Names Gionee M12 Motorola Moto G9 Power
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 1900HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 401, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe, APEM
SpeedHSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 28, 66 - LATAM
Launch
Announced2020, November 16. Released 2020, November 162020, November 05. Released 2020, December 05
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 2), plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions163.9 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.45 x 3.02 x 0.37 in)172.1 x 76.8 x 9.7 mm (6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight196 g (6.91 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
 -Water-repellent coating
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 2
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density)720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density)
Size6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) - model 1Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 - model 2Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) - model 1Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) - model 2Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 610
OSAndroid 10Android 10, upgradable to Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lenses-
Single-8 MP, f/2.6, 1/3", AF
Triple-64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single16 MP16 MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity
Battery
Charging-20W wired
Stand-by-Up to 590 h (2G) / Up to 790 h (3G)
Talk time-Up to 21 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 11 h 40 min (3G)
TypeLi-Po 5100 mAhLi-Po 6000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMagic Green, Dazzling BlackElectric Violet, Metallic Sage
Models-XT2091-3, XT2091-4
PriceAbout 150 EURAbout 260 EUR
SAR-0.55 W/kg (head)     1.49 W/kg (body)    
SAR EU-0.21 W/kg (head)    
Pricing
128GB 4GB RAM-$ 149.99
64GB 4GB RAM-$ 485.00
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -90.3dB / Crosstalk -92.6dB
Battery life- Endurance rating 155h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1680:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -28.6 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 182875 (v8) GeekBench: 1374 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Gionee M12

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Long battery endurance (155h)
  • Basic functionality for essential tasks

  • Weak processor performance (Helio A25/P22)
  • Limited multitasking capabilities
  • Slow charging (likely)
  • Missing display details

Motorola Moto G9 Power

  • More powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
  • Faster 20W charging
  • Brighter display (521 nits)
  • Better overall user experience

  • Higher price than the Gionee M12
  • Still a budget device with limitations
  • Camera details are sparse

Display Comparison

Both the Gionee M12 and Motorola Moto G9 Power feature displays with a 1680:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual characteristics in terms of black levels and color depth. However, the Moto G9 Power boasts a measured peak brightness of 521 nits, which will translate to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Details regarding the panel technology (IPS, TFT) and resolution of the Gionee M12 are missing, making a direct comparison difficult, but the Moto G9 Power’s higher brightness is a clear advantage.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s safe to assume that both cameras will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but will likely struggle in low-light scenarios. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes camera performance as a key selling point.

Performance

The Motorola Moto G9 Power’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) demonstrably outperforms the Gionee M12’s MediaTek Helio A25 (12nm) or Helio P22 (12nm) chipsets. The Snapdragon 662 utilizes a more efficient 11nm process and features Kryo Gold and Silver cores, offering a more balanced and powerful CPU configuration (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) compared to the Gionee M12’s Cortex-A53 based CPUs. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience. The Gionee M12’s Helio A25 variant, with its lower clock speeds (4x1.8 GHz & 4x1.5 GHz), will struggle with demanding applications.

Battery Life

Both the Gionee M12 and Motorola Moto G9 Power achieve an impressive endurance rating of 155 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the Moto G9 Power distinguishes itself with 20W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster replenishment of the battery. While the Gionee M12’s charging speed is not specified, it’s likely to be considerably slower, making the Moto G9 Power more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the Gionee M12 if your absolute priority is the lowest possible upfront cost and you primarily need a phone for basic communication tasks like calls and messaging. You'll need to accept compromises in performance. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Power if you value a more fluid user experience, better app performance, and faster charging, even if it means spending a little more. It’s the better all-rounder for everyday use.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Gionee M12 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Gionee M12’s MediaTek Helio A25 or P22 chipset is relatively weak. While it can handle basic apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, you may experience noticeable lag and slowdowns, especially when multitasking or using more demanding features within those apps. The Moto G9 Power’s Snapdragon 662 will provide a much smoother experience.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G9 Power with the 20W charger?
With the included 20W charger, the Motorola Moto G9 Power can be fully charged from 0% to 100% in approximately 2 hours and 30 minutes. This is significantly faster than the likely charging time for the Gionee M12, which likely uses a slower charger.
❓ Is the camera on either of these phones good enough for casual social media photos?
Both phones will be adequate for casual social media photos in good lighting conditions. However, don't expect exceptional image quality, especially in low light. The lack of detailed camera specifications suggests neither phone prioritizes camera performance.