The Gionee K30 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a 5G experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving that goal, primarily revolving around chipset choice and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Oppo Find X2 Neo is the clear winner. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Gionee K30 Pro’s Mediatek processor, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Gionee K30 Pro remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 08. Released 2020, December | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, May 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 76 x 8 mm (6.50 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Moonlight Black, Starry Blue |
| Models | GSE1020 | CPH2009 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 308231 (v8)
GeekBench: 1815(v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Gionee K30 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- 100h endurance rating
- Less powerful Mediatek chipset
- Slower 20W charging
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Oppo Find X2 Neo
- Faster Snapdragon 765G chipset
- 30W fast charging (50% in 20 min)
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Likely higher price
- 5G connectivity (may not be a benefit for all users)
- 100h endurance rating
Display Comparison
Both the Gionee K30 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Neo boast displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specifications like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type (AMOLED vs. LCD) are missing for the Gionee K30 Pro. The Find X2 Neo’s display, while lacking specific nit ratings in the provided data, benefits from the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) for potentially more accurate color reproduction. Without further data on the K30 Pro’s panel, the Find X2 Neo holds an advantage based on the expectation of a higher-quality display experience typical of Oppo’s mid-range offerings.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is challenging. However, the Oppo Find X2 Neo benefits from Qualcomm’s image processing capabilities within the Snapdragon 765G, which generally delivers superior image quality and dynamic range. It’s reasonable to assume Oppo’s image processing algorithms are more refined than Gionee’s, leading to better photos and videos. The absence of details on the Gionee K30 Pro’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond basic photography.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Oppo Find X2 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) chipset, with its Kryo 475 CPU architecture (2.4 GHz Prime, 2.2 GHz Gold, 1.8 GHz Silver cores), offers a substantial advantage over the Gionee K30 Pro’s unspecified Mediatek chipset with its 2.0 GHz octa-core CPU. The Snapdragon 765G’s 7nm process node is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Find X2 Neo is better equipped for gaming and multitasking, while the K30 Pro will likely exhibit more noticeable slowdowns under heavy load. The lack of RAM specifications for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult, but the chipset difference is paramount.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s 30W wired charging (50% in 20 minutes) provides a significant convenience advantage over the Gionee K30 Pro’s slower 20W charging. While both may last a full day, the Find X2 Neo allows for a much quicker top-up when needed, minimizing downtime. The faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity differences not specified in the provided data.
Buying Guide
Buy the Gionee K30 Pro if you need a functional 5G device on a very tight budget and aren't demanding in terms of gaming or intensive multitasking. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Neo if you prioritize a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, and quicker charging, even if it means spending a bit more. The Find X2 Neo is the better choice for users who frequently game or use demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 765G in the Oppo Find X2 Neo powerful enough for modern mobile games?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is a capable chipset for most mobile games. While it won't deliver the absolute highest frame rates at maximum settings, it can comfortably handle popular titles like PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, and Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with stable performance. The 7nm process also helps with thermal throttling, allowing for longer gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Oppo Find X2 Neo compared to the 20W charging on the Gionee K30 Pro in real-world use?
The 30W charging on the Find X2 Neo can add approximately 50% charge in just 20 minutes, while the 20W charging on the K30 Pro will take considerably longer – likely closer to 40-60 minutes to reach the same charge level. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
❓ Does the Mediatek chipset in the Gionee K30 Pro support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Without specific details on the Mediatek chipset model, it's difficult to definitively say. However, many Mediatek chipsets support carrier aggregation, but the extent of support can vary. The Snapdragon 765G in the Oppo Find X2 Neo generally offers robust carrier aggregation capabilities, potentially leading to faster and more stable 5G connections in areas with good network coverage.
