The Gionee G13 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an accessible price, but they take different approaches to processing power. This comparison dissects their core components – the Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Helio G25 – to determine which device offers the better user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic tasks like calling, messaging, and light social media, the Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport offers a slightly more balanced experience due to its octa-core configuration. However, the Gionee G13 Pro’s Cortex-A75 core provides a performance edge in single-threaded tasks, making it preferable for those occasionally needing a bit more responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 28 | 2021, September 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 30 | Available. Released 2021, September 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 158 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.22 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~280 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 94.6 cm2 (~78.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver, Purple | Carbon Black, Coral Green, Metallic Blue |
| Models | GNV5221 | - |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 100 EUR |
Gionee G13 Pro
- Potentially faster single-core performance due to Cortex-A75 core.
- Unisoc Tiger T310 offers a different architecture, potentially better optimized for specific tasks.
- May offer slightly better battery life due to potentially lower power consumption.
- Quad-core configuration may struggle with heavy multitasking.
- Limited information available regarding camera and display quality.
Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport
- Octa-core configuration provides better multitasking capabilities.
- 10W charging included.
- MediaTek Helio G25 is a well-established chipset with known performance characteristics.
- Cortex-A53 cores are less efficient and powerful than Cortex-A75.
- 2MP macro camera is likely of limited practical use.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely utilizing LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are missing, but we can assume they are similar – around 720p and moderate brightness levels. The focus here is on functionality, not visual fidelity. Bezels are likely substantial on both, impacting the overall screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be comparable and limited on both devices. Details regarding sensor size and image processing are unavailable. However, given the price point, expect basic image quality suitable for casual snapshots. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Redmi 9A Sport is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience; its small sensor and fixed focus limit its usefulness. The Gionee G13 Pro’s camera specs are also unknown, but it’s reasonable to assume a similar level of performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Gionee G13 Pro’s Unisoc Tiger T310 features a quad-core configuration with one high-performance Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. This 'big.LITTLE' architecture aims for efficiency and burst performance. Conversely, the Redmi 9A Sport’s MediaTek Helio G25 utilizes an octa-core setup of four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz and another four at 1.5 GHz. While the Helio G25 has more cores, the A53 architecture is less efficient and powerful than the A75 found in the Gionee. This means the G13 Pro will likely excel in tasks that benefit from single-core performance, while the 9A Sport may handle sustained multi-threaded workloads slightly better. The 12nm process node is shared by both, suggesting similar thermal characteristics.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Redmi 9A Sport includes 10W wired charging, which is a standard, albeit slow, charging speed. The Gionee G13 Pro’s charging capabilities are unknown. Given the less powerful CPU in the Gionee, it *may* achieve slightly longer battery life on a single charge, but this is speculative without knowing the battery capacity. The 10W charging on the Redmi 9A Sport will take a considerable amount of time to fully recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Gionee G13 Pro if you frequently switch between apps or need a slightly snappier experience for single-threaded tasks like web browsing. Its Cortex-A75 core offers a performance boost over the Redmi 9A Sport’s all-A53 setup. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport if you prioritize consistent multitasking and a slightly more efficient power draw for extended battery life during everyday use. The octa-core design handles background processes more effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Gionee G13 Pro handle basic gaming like PUBG Mobile?
While the Tiger T310 can run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at the lowest graphics settings and frame rates. The GPU is not powerful enough for a smooth experience at higher settings. The Helio G25 in the Redmi 9A Sport will offer a similar gaming experience.
❓ Is the MediaTek Helio G25 in the Redmi 9A Sport sufficient for running popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram?
Yes, the Helio G25 is more than capable of handling social media apps. These applications are not particularly demanding, and the octa-core processor will ensure smooth scrolling and quick loading times. The Gionee G13 Pro will also perform adequately for these tasks.
❓ How much faster is the Cortex-A75 core in the Gionee G13 Pro compared to the Cortex-A53 cores in the Redmi 9A Sport?
The Cortex-A75 core offers significantly higher single-core performance than the Cortex-A53. Benchmarks show the A75 can be up to 40-50% faster in single-threaded tasks, resulting in a more responsive experience when launching apps or browsing the web.
❓ Does the Redmi 9A Sport support fast charging beyond the 10W standard?
No, the Redmi 9A Sport is limited to 10W wired charging. There is no support for faster charging protocols. This means a full charge will take several hours.
