Essential PH-1 vs. Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo wins overall thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more modern chipset. While the Essential PH-1 boasts a powerful Snapdragon 835, its age and lack of modern features make it less competitive in today's market.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Essential PH-1 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 & TD-SCDMA | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2017, May | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2017, August | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), ceramic back, titanium frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 141.5 x 71.1 x 7.8 mm (5.57 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1312 x 2560 pixels (~504 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.71 inches, 85.4 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 540 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 7.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.9, 1/3.1", PDAF, Laser AF 13 MP B/W, f/1.9, 1/3.1" | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Snap-on accessories (optional) | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 27W wired, PD2.0 | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 3040 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stellar Gray, Ocean Depths, Black Moon, Pure White | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | PH-1 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | GeekBench: 6490 (v4.4) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Essential PH-1
- Unique, minimalist design
- Powerful Snapdragon 835 (for its time)
- PD 2.0 charging
- Outdated chipset
- Limited camera features
- Poor battery life compared to modern phones
- Modular design not fully realized
- Software support discontinued
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Fast 68W wired charging & 5W wireless charging
- Bright and vibrant display
- Modern Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Excellent battery life
- 5G connectivity
- Snapdragon 695 5G isn't a flagship processor
- Camera may not compete with top-tier phones
- Design is relatively generic
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 1004 nits max brightness significantly outshines the Essential PH-1's display, offering better visibility in sunlight. The Edge 30 Neo's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image quality, while the PH-1's display, though decent for its time, lacks the vibrancy and brightness of modern panels.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is a complex area. The Essential PH-1 had a 13MP rear camera, which was good for its time, but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo likely offers superior image processing and potentially more versatile camera features (e.g., ultrawide, macro) due to its newer hardware and software. Specific camera specs for the PH-1 are limited, making a direct comparison difficult.
Performance
While the Essential PH-1's Snapdragon 835 was a flagship chipset in its day, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's Snapdragon 695 5G, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers comparable performance with better power efficiency. The Edge 30 Neo also benefits from modern software optimizations.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's endurance rating of 104h is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Essential PH-1 had a 3000mAh battery, its older chipset and lack of power optimization likely result in significantly shorter real-world battery life compared to the Edge 30 Neo.
Buying Guide
The Essential PH-1 is for enthusiasts seeking a unique, albeit dated, Android experience and appreciating its minimalist design. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging, a vibrant display, and a modern, reliable mid-range phone.