Both the Energizer Ultimate U710S and the Samsung Galaxy A01 Core target the ultra-budget smartphone market, but they approach it with significantly different hardware. This comparison dives deep into the core differences – specifically the chipsets – to determine which device offers the best experience for users prioritizing performance and longevity.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a functional smartphone for basic tasks, the Energizer Ultimate U710S is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio P23 chipset, built on a smaller 16nm process, delivers substantially better performance than the Galaxy A01 Core’s older, less efficient MT6739. While neither phone excels, the U710S offers a smoother, more responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 17 | 2020, July 21. Released 2020, August 06 |
| Status | Cancelled | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 180.3 x 86.8 x 9.2 mm (7.10 x 3.42 x 0.36 in) | 141.7 x 67.5 x 8.6 mm (5.58 x 2.66 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 150 g (5.29 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2244 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~350 ppi density) | 720 x 1480 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~311 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.12 inches, 127.8 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.3 inches, 71.3 cm2 (~74.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM, 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, PDAF
VGA | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | SM-A013F, SM-A013F/DS, SM-A013G, SM-A013G/DS, SM-A013M |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.64 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
Energizer Ultimate U710S
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More efficient chipset for potentially longer battery life
- Better suited for multitasking and light gaming
- May not have the same brand recognition as Samsung
- 10W charging is relatively slow
Samsung Galaxy A01 Core
- Strong brand recognition and support
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer)
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Significantly slower processor leading to lag and frustration
- Less efficient chipset resulting in shorter battery life
- Struggles with even basic multitasking
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-quality display. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with modest resolutions. However, display quality isn't the focus here; the core difference lies in processing power. We can assume both will have similar brightness levels, adequate for indoor use but potentially washed out in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume the image quality will be similar – adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions, but lacking in detail and dynamic range. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and won't significantly improve image quality. The U710S’s more powerful processor *could* offer slightly faster image processing, but the sensor itself will be the limiting factor.
Performance
The Energizer U710S’s Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 is the defining advantage. Its octa-core configuration (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A01 Core’s quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 processor. The Helio P23’s 16nm manufacturing process is also more efficient than the A01 Core’s 28nm MT6739, resulting in better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user interface on the U710S. The A01 Core will struggle with even moderate multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While the exact battery capacities are unknown, the U710S’s more efficient chipset will likely result in longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the A01 Core. The U710S’s 10W charging is standard for this price range, and both phones will likely take several hours to fully charge from 0-100%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer Ultimate U710S if you need a phone capable of handling more than just basic calling and texting – light social media, occasional gaming, and multitasking will be noticeably smoother. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A01 Core if your primary need is a very basic, affordable phone for essential communication and you prioritize brand recognition over performance. It's best suited for first-time smartphone users or as a temporary device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy A01 Core struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the Galaxy A01 Core’s MT6739 chipset is quite limited. While it can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag when switching between them or loading media. The Energizer U710S will provide a much smoother experience with these commonly used applications.
❓ Can the Energizer Ultimate U710S handle any mobile games?
The U710S can handle light mobile games, but don’t expect high frame rates or detailed graphics. Games like Candy Crush or simple puzzle games will be playable, but more demanding titles like PUBG Mobile will likely be unplayable or require extremely low settings. The A01 Core will struggle even with basic games.
❓ Is the difference in chipset manufacturing process (16nm vs 28nm) significant?
Yes, it's very significant. A smaller manufacturing process (16nm) means more transistors can be packed into the same space, leading to increased performance and improved power efficiency. The U710S’s 16nm Helio P23 is considerably more advanced than the A01 Core’s 28nm MT6739.
