Both the Energizer Ultimate U710S and Motorola Moto E6 Play target the ultra-budget smartphone market, but they approach it with significantly different internal hardware. This comparison dissects the core differences – specifically the chipsets – to determine which device delivers the better user experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Energizer Ultimate U710S is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio P23 chipset, built on a smaller 16nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Moto E6 Play’s older, less efficient Mediatek MT6739. While both phones prioritize affordability, the U710S provides a smoother, more responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 17 | 2019, October. Released 2019, November |
| Status | Cancelled | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 180.3 x 86.8 x 9.2 mm (7.10 x 3.42 x 0.36 in) | 146.5 x 70.9 x 8.3 mm (5.77 x 2.79 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 140 g (4.94 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2244 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~350 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.12 inches, 127.8 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 77.0 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, PDAF
VGA | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Turquoise Blue, Anthracite |
| Models | - | XT2029, XT2029-1 |
| Price | - | About 160 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.78 W/kg (body) |
Energizer Ultimate U710S
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More efficient chipset (16nm) for better thermal management
- Octa-core CPU handles multitasking better
- May have slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
- Potentially higher price point
Motorola Moto E6 Play
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler user experience
- Potentially longer battery life during very light use
- Slow processor struggles with multitasking
- Less efficient chipset (28nm) leads to more heat
- Quad-core CPU limits performance
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. However, display quality beyond resolution isn't specified. The focus here is on the internal components driving the experience, not the panel itself. Expect basic viewing angles and color reproduction on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not detailed enough to draw meaningful conclusions beyond the sensor. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact the overall camera experience; these sensors often produce low-quality images. The chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) will play a role, and the Helio P23's more advanced ISP will likely provide better image processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Energizer U710S’s Mediatek Helio P23 is an octa-core processor featuring four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and another four at 1.5 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Motorola Moto E6 Play’s Mediatek MT6739, a quad-core processor with all cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. The Helio P23’s octa-core configuration and higher clock speeds translate to significantly faster processing, especially in multi-threaded applications. Crucially, the Helio P23 is fabricated on a 16nm process, offering better power efficiency compared to the Moto E6 Play’s 28nm MT6739. This means the U710S can sustain performance for longer periods without overheating, and potentially deliver better battery life *despite* potentially higher power draw during peak usage. The U710S will handle app switching and multitasking with noticeably less lag.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Mediatek MT6739’s 28nm process is inherently less efficient than the Helio P23’s 16nm process. While the Moto E6 Play might appear to have longer battery life on paper due to its lower power consumption, the U710S’s more efficient chipset could offset any capacity differences, especially during moderate to heavy usage. Both phones feature 10W wired charging, indicating relatively slow charging speeds – expect several hours to fully charge from 0%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer Ultimate U710S if you prioritize responsiveness for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Its octa-core processor will handle multitasking more effectively. Buy the Motorola Moto E6 Play if your needs are extremely basic – primarily making calls and sending texts – and you value simplicity and potentially longer battery life due to the less powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Energizer U710S be able to run popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Helio P23 chipset in the U710S is capable of running social media apps like TikTok and Instagram without significant lag. The octa-core processor and improved efficiency will provide a much smoother experience compared to the Moto E6 Play’s quad-core processor.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for basic tasks like calling and texting?
For *strictly* calling and texting, the difference will be minimal. However, even basic tasks like opening the contacts app or switching between apps will feel snappier on the Energizer U710S due to its more powerful processor. The Moto E6 Play may exhibit noticeable delays in these scenarios.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto E6 Play support software updates, and will it receive security patches?
Motorola’s update track record for the E series is historically limited. While the Moto E6 Play likely launched with Android Go Edition (optimized for low-RAM devices), long-term software support and security patches are not guaranteed. The Energizer U710S’s update support is also uncertain, but Mediatek chipsets generally have broader software compatibility.
