The Energizer Ultimate U652S and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent two distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The U652S aims for basic functionality at an extremely low price point, while the Redmi Note 11R attempts to deliver a more modern experience with a more powerful chipset and faster charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset offers significantly improved performance and future-proofing compared to the Energizer U652S’s aging Mediatek MT6739WW. While the U652S might appeal to those on the absolute tightest budget, the 11R provides a far more enjoyable and capable smartphone experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739WW (28 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | IMG 8XE1PPC | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 18 MP (wide), AF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | - | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Energizer Ultimate U652S
- Extremely low price point
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Potentially longer standby time due to simpler features
- Outdated and slow processor
- Poor performance for multitasking and gaming
- Likely low-quality camera
- No fast charging
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- Significantly faster processor
- Improved performance for gaming and multitasking
- 18W fast charging
- More modern chipset with better power efficiency
- Higher price than the Energizer U652S
- May still lack features found in higher-end smartphones
- Camera quality, while better, may not be flagship-level
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data, we can assume both utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the lack of specific display specs for the U652S suggests a lower resolution and potentially poorer color accuracy. The Redmi Note 11R, while not confirmed, likely benefits from a higher resolution display due to its more modern chipset’s ability to drive it. The absence of features like high refresh rates or HDR support on either device is expected at this price point.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume the Redmi Note 11R will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera system. Modern chipsets like the Dimensity 700 include improved image signal processors (ISPs) for better noise reduction and dynamic range. The U652S, with its older chipset, will likely produce less detailed and vibrant photos, especially in low-light conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility; these are often included for marketing purposes rather than genuine photographic benefit.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, features an octa-core CPU (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) and a more capable GPU. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. In contrast, the Energizer U652S’s Mediatek MT6739WW (28nm) with its quad-core 1.5 GHz CPU will struggle with demanding tasks and may exhibit noticeable lag. The 7nm Dimensity 700 also offers superior power efficiency, contributing to better battery life.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset in the 11R will likely deliver comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar or even slightly smaller battery. The faster charging speed will also reduce downtime, allowing users to quickly top up their device when needed. The U652S, lacking fast charging, will require significantly longer to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer Ultimate U652S if you absolutely need the cheapest possible smartphone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light app usage. It’s a viable option for a first phone for a child or as a temporary backup device. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you prioritize performance for social media, streaming, and occasional gaming, and appreciate the convenience of faster charging. It’s a better long-term investment for most users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R be able to run popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Redmi Note 11R is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it's a significant improvement over the Energizer U652S, which would likely struggle even at the lowest settings.
❓ Is the Energizer U652S a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Energizer U652S is a viable option if your primary use case is basic communication. Its low price makes it suitable for those who need a functional phone without advanced features. However, be prepared for slower performance and a less responsive experience compared to more modern smartphones.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Redmi Note 11R compared to the Energizer U652S?
The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging is considerably faster than what the Energizer U652S likely offers (standard 5W charging). Expect the Redmi Note 11R to charge from 0-100% in approximately 2-3 hours, while the U652S could take 5-6 hours or even longer.
