Energizer Ultimate U608s vs Xiaomi Pocophone F1: The Ultimate Budget Showdown

Looking for a fantastic smartphone without breaking the bank? The Energizer Ultimate U608s and the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 both promise incredible value, but which one delivers the best experience? We're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison to help you choose.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Pocophone F1 is the clear winner. While the U608s boasts a massive battery, the F1's superior processor, better camera, and faster charging make it the more compelling choice for most users seeking a budget powerhouse.

PHONES
Phone Names Energizer Ultimate U608s Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat16 1024/150 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, June2018, August 22. Released 2018, August 27
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, JulyDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions155.4 x 73.3 x 9.8 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.39 in)155.5 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight156.8 g (5.54 oz)182 g (6.42 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)
Resolution720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~277 ppi density)1080 x 2246 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size6.08 inches, 92.3 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.18 inches, 96.2 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUQuad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 385 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 630
OSAndroid 12 (Go edition)Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal32GB 2GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1UFS 2.1
Main Camera
Dual-12 MP, f/1.9, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flashDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single5 MP-
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@240fps, 720p@960fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single5 MP20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm
Video720p1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio, recording
USBmicroUSBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
Sensors-Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging-18W wired, QC3
TypeLi-Ion 3000 mAhLi-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlackGraphite Black, Steel Blue, Rosso Red, Armored Edition with Kevlar
Models-M1805E10A, POCO F1
PriceAbout 90 EURAbout 360 EUR
SAR-0.66 W/kg (head)     1.18 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.54 W/kg (head)     1.58 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB
Battery life- Endurance rating 94h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1468:1 (nominal), 3.059 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 72dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 86dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 265314 (v7) GeekBench: 9003 (v4.4) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Energizer Ultimate U608s

  • Exceptional battery life
  • Durable build
  • Large battery capacity

  • Weak processor
  • Mediocre camera
  • Slow charging
  • Basic design

Xiaomi Pocophone F1

  • Powerful Snapdragon 845 processor
  • Excellent camera
  • Fast charging (QC3)
  • Premium design
  • Good display

  • Older model
  • Battery life not as exceptional as U608s

Display Comparison

Both phones feature displays with a respectable contrast ratio of 1468:1 and excellent sunlight readability (3.059). However, the Pocophone F1 typically has a slightly brighter display and a more vibrant color profile, offering a more enjoyable viewing experience. The U608s may have a slightly larger screen, but the F1's overall display quality is superior.

Camera Comparison

The Pocophone F1's camera system is noticeably better. While both offer decent photo and video capabilities, the F1 captures more detail, has better dynamic range, and performs better in low-light conditions. The U608s camera is acceptable for casual snapshots, but lacks the F1's versatility and image quality.

Performance

This is where the Pocophone F1 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 845 chipset is significantly more powerful than the U608s' Helio A22. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience on the F1. The U608s is adequate for basic tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.

Battery Life

The Energizer U608s is marketed for its exceptional battery life, and it delivers. While both phones have endurance ratings of 94h, the U608s' larger battery capacity contributes to longer real-world usage between charges. However, the Pocophone F1's 18W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.

Buying Guide

The Energizer Ultimate U608s is ideal for users prioritizing extreme battery life above all else and who don't need high-end performance. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is perfect for those wanting a fast, capable phone with a good camera and a premium feel, all at an affordable price.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Energizer U608s good for gaming?
The U608s' processor is not ideal for demanding games. You'll likely experience lag and reduced frame rates.
❓ How does the Pocophone F1's age affect its performance?
While it's an older model, the Snapdragon 845 remains a capable processor, and the Pocophone F1 still offers excellent value for its price.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Xiaomi generally provides better software updates and support for its devices than Energizer.