Google Pixel 7a vs. Energizer Ultimate 65G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and superior AI capabilities, complemented by a class-leading camera system. While the Energizer Ultimate 65G offers a compelling value proposition, its Dimensity 700 struggles to keep pace with the Pixel 7a’s overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Energizer Ultimate 65G | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, Q3 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.4 x 9.2 mm (6.47 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Energizer Ultimate 65G
- Superior performance with the Google Tensor G2 chip
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Long-term software support and updates from Google
- Slightly slower wired charging (18W)
- Higher price point compared to the Energizer Ultimate 65G
Google Pixel 7a
- Very affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Faster wired charging (20W)
- Significantly weaker performance with the Dimensity 700
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited software support and updates
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an assumed lower brightness on the Energizer Ultimate 65G (typical of its price bracket). While the Energizer’s display specs are unavailable, the Pixel 7a’s brightness ensures excellent visibility outdoors. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (not specified for the Energizer) contributes to smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience. The Pixel 7a likely utilizes an OLED panel, offering superior contrast and color accuracy compared to the Energizer’s likely LCD.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a excels in camera capabilities, leveraging Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms. While specific sensor details are not provided, the Pixel 7a’s camera is known for its excellent dynamic range, accurate colors, and impressive low-light performance. The Energizer Ultimate 65G’s camera is likely a more basic setup, prioritizing functionality over image quality. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, offering features like 4K recording and advanced stabilization. Ignoring the likely inclusion of a low-resolution macro lens on the Energizer, the Pixel 7a’s image processing is a significant advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) is a flagship-class processor with a tri-cluster configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – designed for AI and machine learning tasks. This contrasts sharply with the Energizer Ultimate 65G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) with its dual-core Cortex-A76 setup. The Tensor G2’s 5nm fabrication process provides greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, resulting in superior performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Pixel 7a will handle demanding apps and games with ease, while the Energizer Ultimate 65G will likely struggle with graphically intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating strong battery life. While the Energizer Ultimate 65G’s battery capacity is unknown, its 20W wired charging is slightly faster than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging. However, the Pixel 7a supports PD3.0 for faster and more efficient charging, and also offers 7.5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Energizer. The Tensor G2’s power efficiency, despite its performance, contributes to the Pixel 7a’s respectable battery life, offsetting the slightly slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer Ultimate 65G if you prioritize affordability above all else and need a basic, functional 5G smartphone for essential tasks. It’s a good option for users on a very tight budget or those needing a secondary device. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value camera quality, smooth performance, and access to Google’s latest software features, even if it means spending a bit more. It’s ideal for photography enthusiasts, social media users, and anyone who wants a reliable and capable everyday smartphone.