Energizer Hardcase H620S vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G and Rugged Design
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster data speeds, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 480 5G chipset, built on an 8nm process, offers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the Energizer H620S’s older Helio P22. However, the H620S remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget and with limited 5G access.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Energizer Hardcase H620S | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December. Released 2021, February 09 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163 x 78.2 x 12 mm (6.42 x 3.08 x 0.47 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 250 g (8.82 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.2m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~77.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 48 MP, PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Energizer Hardcase H620S
- Extremely affordable price point
- Ruggedized design for enhanced durability
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding chipset (depending on capacity)
- Outdated Helio P22 chipset offers limited performance
- No 5G connectivity
- Likely slower app loading and multitasking
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Wireless charging support for added convenience
- Higher price compared to the Energizer H620S
- May not offer significantly better battery life than H620S if capacity is similar
- Rugged design may add bulk
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. The Energizer H620S, with its Helio P22, will likely have a less powerful image signal processor (ISP) impacting display color accuracy and dynamic range. The Nokia XR20’s Snapdragon 480 offers a more capable ISP, potentially resulting in a more vibrant and accurate visual experience, though specific panel specs (resolution, brightness) are not provided.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nokia XR20 benefits from the more advanced ISP within the Snapdragon 480. This translates to better image processing, improved low-light performance, and potentially more accurate color reproduction. While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the XR20’s chipset will likely handle computational photography tasks (HDR, night mode) more effectively. The H620S will likely rely more heavily on hardware limitations, resulting in less refined images.
Performance
The performance gap between these two is substantial. The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, fabricated on an 8nm process, is a clear upgrade over the Energizer H620S’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The Snapdragon 480’s Kryo 460 cores, with their 2x2.0 GHz and 6x1.8 GHz configuration, provide a more balanced and efficient performance profile. The Helio P22’s Cortex-A53 cores, while octa-core, are older and less efficient, leading to slower app loading times and potential stuttering with multitasking. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480 also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use.
Battery Life
Battery life is a complex equation. While the Energizer H620S’s battery capacity is unknown, the Nokia XR20’s more efficient Snapdragon 480 5G chipset will likely deliver comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity. Furthermore, the XR20 offers the convenience of 18W wired and 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the H620S. This allows for more flexible charging options and potentially faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer Hardcase H620S if you need a highly durable phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light app usage, and 5G connectivity isn't a priority. You'll benefit from its robust build quality at a very low price point. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a phone with 5G capabilities, a more responsive user experience, and the added convenience of wireless charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.