Motorola Defy 2 vs. Energizer Hardcase H620S: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices

The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific need: durability. Both the Motorola Defy 2 and the Energizer Hardcase H620S aim to deliver on that promise, but they approach it with vastly different internal hardware and price points. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the chipset choices impact real-world performance and user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Defy 2 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 930 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power and efficiency compared to the Energizer H620S’s Helio P22. However, the H620S remains a viable option for those on a strict budget needing basic smartphone functionality in a durable package.

PHONES
Phone Names Energizer Hardcase H620S Motorola Defy 2
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71
5G bands-2, 5, 23, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2020, December. Released 2021, February 092023, February 24
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2023, October
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame
Dimensions163 x 78.2 x 12 mm (6.42 x 3.08 x 0.47 in)171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight250 g (8.82 oz)268 g (9.45 oz)
 IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.2m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2mIP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~260 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size6.2 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~77.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 120Hz
Platform
CPUOcta-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320IMG BXM-8-256
OSAndroid 10Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDHC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flashDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single48 MP, PDAF-
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 -Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service)
Battery
Charging-15W wireless
TypeLi-Ion 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlackBlack
Models-BM1S1B
PriceAbout 300 EURAbout 570 EUR

Energizer Hardcase H620S

  • Extremely affordable price point
  • Ruggedized design for durability
  • Simple and easy-to-use interface

  • Outdated and underpowered chipset
  • Poor performance for demanding tasks
  • Likely limited software support

Motorola Defy 2

  • Powerful Dimensity 930 chipset
  • Wireless charging capability
  • Improved camera performance

  • Higher price compared to the H620S
  • Rugged design may add bulk
  • Software updates may be limited

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. The Energizer H620S’s display specifications are unavailable, but given its price point, it likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The Motorola Defy 2, while also likely LCD, benefits from the processing power of its Dimensity 930 to potentially offer better image processing. The lack of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on power conservation rather than visual fluidity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, prioritizing structural integrity over a modern, edge-to-edge design.

Camera Comparison

Camera details for the Energizer H620S are sparse, suggesting a basic imaging experience. The Motorola Defy 2’s camera specifications are also limited in available data, but the Dimensity 930’s image signal processor (ISP) is far more capable than the one found in the Helio P22. This translates to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While neither phone is likely to compete with flagship camera phones, the Defy 2 will deliver noticeably better photos and videos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of 15W wireless charging on the Defy 2 suggests a more premium overall experience, hinting at potentially better camera software features.

Performance

The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Energizer H620S’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm) with its Cortex-A53 cores is a budget-oriented chipset designed for basic tasks. The Motorola Defy 2’s Dimensity 930 (6nm) is a completely different beast, featuring a combination of Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 930 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance under load. This means the Defy 2 will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding apps with ease, while the H620S will struggle. The Defy 2’s CPU architecture is also more modern, offering better instructions-per-clock (IPC) performance.

Battery Life

Battery capacity for both devices is unknown. However, the Dimensity 930’s superior power efficiency in the Motorola Defy 2 means it will likely achieve comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery than the Energizer H620S. The Defy 2’s 15W wireless charging is a significant advantage, offering convenient top-ups without needing a cable. The H620S likely relies solely on wired charging, and its charging speed is expected to be slower.

Buying Guide

Buy the Energizer Hardcase H620S if you need a highly affordable, extremely durable phone for basic communication and light tasks – think construction workers needing a reliable call device. Buy the Motorola Defy 2 if you prefer a rugged phone that can handle demanding applications, streaming, and gaming, and if wireless charging is a must-have feature. The Defy 2 is for users who want a phone that won't slow down after a year of use.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Motorola Defy 2’s Dimensity 930 chipset prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 930’s 6nm process node and efficient thermal design mitigate overheating concerns. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Defy 2 should maintain stable performance without significant throttling, unlike the Helio P22 in the H620S which would likely struggle and throttle quickly.
❓ How does the ruggedization of the Motorola Defy 2 compare to the Energizer Hardcase H620S in terms of drop resistance and water/dust ingress protection?
Both phones are designed for rugged use, but specific certifications (IP ratings, MIL-STD-810G compliance) are needed for a precise comparison. However, the Defy 2’s more modern construction and potentially better materials may offer a slight edge in overall durability, though both should withstand typical drops and exposure to dust and water.
❓ Will the Energizer Hardcase H620S receive Android updates, and for how long?
Given the H620S’s budget chipset and target market, long-term software support is unlikely. Expect limited updates, potentially only security patches, and a relatively short lifespan in terms of Android version compatibility. The Defy 2 may receive slightly better support, but rugged phones generally have shorter update cycles than mainstream devices.