The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific need: durability. Both the Energizer Hardcase H620S and the Cat S62 Pro aim to deliver on that promise, but they approach it with different internal hardware and target slightly different user profiles. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which offers the best blend of performance, resilience, and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a smoother user experience, the Cat S62 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 660 chipset, built on a 14nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Energizer H620S’s Helio P22, despite the latter’s more modern 12nm fabrication.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, December. Released 2021, February 09 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 78.2 x 12 mm (6.42 x 3.08 x 0.47 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 250 g (8.82 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| | IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.2m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m
MIL-STD-810H compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~77.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Single | 48 MP, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Energizer Hardcase H620S
- More affordable price point
- Extremely durable build quality
- Potentially longer battery life during light use
- Significantly slower performance
- Less capable camera system
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Cat S62 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 660
- Integrated thermal camera for professional use
- Smoother user experience and faster app loading
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be slightly bulkier due to thermal camera module
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display excellence, focusing instead on ruggedness. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, the Cat S62 Pro’s higher processing power suggests a potentially more fluid user interface and faster response times when interacting with the display. The Energizer H620S, with its Helio P22, may exhibit slight lag in animations. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, prioritizing visibility in direct sunlight over color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Cat S62 Pro’s focus on professional use cases (construction, field work), it’s reasonable to assume a more refined image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor size for improved low-light performance. The Energizer H620S likely prioritizes affordability, potentially resulting in a less sophisticated camera system. The presence of a dedicated thermal camera on the Cat S62 Pro is a significant differentiator, catering to professionals needing temperature readings in the field – a feature absent on the H620S.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) boasts an octa-core CPU configuration with Kryo 260 cores clocked up to 2.2 GHz. This architecture, featuring both performance (Gold) and efficiency (Silver) cores, allows for dynamic power allocation, resulting in better sustained performance under load. Conversely, the Energizer H620S utilizes the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12nm) with a uniform octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. While the 12nm process *should* offer better efficiency, the Cortex-A53 cores are less powerful than the Kryo 260s, leading to a noticeable performance gap in demanding applications. The Snapdragon 660’s Adreno 512 GPU also significantly outperforms the Helio P22’s PowerVR GE8320, making the Cat S62 Pro the clear winner for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Snapdragon 660’s more efficient architecture, despite being on a larger 14nm node, could translate to comparable or even better battery life than the Helio P22, especially during sustained use. The Cat S62 Pro’s faster charging capabilities (assuming it supports a higher wattage than the H620S, based on brand positioning) would also reduce downtime, making it more convenient for users who rely on their phone throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer Hardcase H620S if you need a highly affordable, extremely durable phone for basic communication and light tasks, and are willing to accept compromises in processing power. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a more responsive device capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and demanding work applications, and are willing to pay a premium for the improved performance and potentially longer software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Energizer Hardcase H620S struggle with modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Helio P22 chipset in the H620S is not designed for demanding gaming. While you might be able to run these games at the lowest settings, expect significant frame rate drops and lag, making the experience less than ideal. The Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Is the thermal camera on the Cat S62 Pro useful for everyday users, or is it strictly for professionals?
While primarily aimed at professionals in fields like construction, electrical work, and HVAC, the thermal camera can be useful for everyday users as well. It can help identify heat leaks in homes, locate cold spots, or even diagnose potential issues with electronics. However, its value will depend on individual needs and use cases.
❓ How does the build quality of the Energizer H620S compare to the Cat S62 Pro in terms of drop resistance and water/dust proofing?
Both phones are built to withstand harsh conditions, meeting MIL-STD-810H standards. However, Cat phones are generally known for their exceptionally robust construction, often exceeding the minimum requirements of the standard. While the H620S is undoubtedly durable, the S62 Pro likely offers a slightly higher level of protection against drops, water ingress, and dust penetration.
