Energizer Hard Case G5 vs Nokia XR20: A Detailed Performance and Durability Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and responsiveness, the Energizer Hard Case G5 is the better choice thanks to its superior chipset. However, the Nokia XR20 offers a more well-rounded experience with the convenience of wireless charging and a potentially more refined software experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Energizer Hard Case G5 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 29. Released 2021, Q4 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 167.7 x 78.2 x 13.7 mm (6.60 x 3.08 x 0.54 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.2m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~74.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), AF 20 MP, f/1.8 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Energizer Hard Case G5
- More powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Likely lower price point given chipset
- No wireless charging
- Potentially less refined software experience
- Unknown battery capacity and charging speed
Nokia XR20
- Wireless charging for added convenience
- Potentially better software support and updates
- More balanced overall feature set
- Less powerful processor
- Slower performance in demanding applications
- Higher price likely due to added features
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display. Details on panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing, but the focus is clearly on durability rather than visual fidelity. The absence of high refresh rates suggests both prioritize battery life. The XR20’s inclusion of wireless charging implies a more modern display controller, potentially offering slightly better power efficiency, but this is speculative without further data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the XR20 likely prioritizes image processing and software optimization, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP. The G5, focusing on raw power, may rely more on the chipset’s capabilities without extensive software enhancements. The absence of OIS information for either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The Energizer Hard Case G5’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U, fabricated on a 7nm process, holds a significant advantage over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 (8nm). The Dimensity 800U’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, offer substantially more processing power than the Snapdragon 480’s Kryo 460 cores, also at 2.0 GHz. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences translate to faster application loading and smoother multitasking on the G5. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480, while newer, doesn’t fully offset the architectural advantage of the Dimensity 800U. This difference will be most noticeable in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Nokia XR20’s inclusion of 18W wired and 15W wireless charging provides a significant convenience advantage. The Energizer G5 likely relies solely on wired charging, and its charging speed is unknown. The XR20’s wireless charging capability allows for topping up the battery without needing a cable, a valuable feature for users on the go. The Snapdragon 480’s 8nm process may contribute to slightly better power efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity compared to the G5.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer Hard Case G5 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks like mobile gaming or video editing on the go, and aren't concerned about wireless charging. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a more balanced device with a focus on durability, long-term software support, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.