Energizer Energy E12 vs. Samsung E1200 Pusha: A Battle of Basic Phones

In a market saturated with smartphones, the ultra-basic feature phone continues to hold appeal for those seeking simplicity, durability, and extended battery life. We pit the Energizer Energy E12, powered by a Spreadtrum chipset, against the Samsung E1200 Pusha, featuring a 156 MHz CPU, to determine which device best serves the needs of users prioritizing core communication functions.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user needing a reliable, no-frills phone, the Energizer Energy E12 likely offers a more modern experience due to its Spreadtrum SC6531E chipset. While the Samsung E1200 Pusha is undeniably simple, the older CPU architecture may result in slower performance and limited future compatibility.

PHONES
Phone Names Energizer Energy E12 Samsung E1200 Pusha
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 900 / 1800
EDGEYesNo
GPRSYesNo
TechnologyGSMGSM
Launch
Announced2019, April. Released 2019, June2012. Released 2012
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions117 x 51 x 15 mm (4.61 x 2.01 x 0.59 in)108 x 45 x 13.5 mm (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 in)
SIMDual SIM (Mini-SIM)Mini-SIM
Weight91 g (3.21 oz)65.1 g (2.29 oz)
 - Flashlight-
Display
Resolution128 x 160 pixels (~114 ppi density)128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~119 ppi density)
Size1.8 inches, 10.2 cm2 (~17.1% screen-to-body ratio)1.52 inches, 7.5 cm2 (~15.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT LCD, 256K colorsTFT, 65K colors
Platform
CPU-156 MHz
ChipsetSpreadtrum SC6531E-
Memory
Call recordsYesYes
Card slotmicroSDHCNo
Internal4MB 4MB RAM-
PhonebookYesYes
Main Camera
SingleVGA-
VideoYes-
Selfie camera
SingleVGA-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth2.1No
NFCNo-
PositioningNoNo
RadioFM radioNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0Proprietary
WLANNoNo
Features
Games-No
JavaNoNo
MessagingSMS, MMSSMS
Battery
Stand-by-Up to 720 h
Talk time-Up to 7 h
TypeLi-Ion 1000 mAh batteryRemovable Li-Ion 800 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsBlackBlack, White, Blue
PriceAbout 10 EURAbout 20 EUR
SAR EU-0.81 W/kg (head)
Camera
 -No

Energizer Energy E12

  • More modern Spreadtrum chipset offers potential for better performance.
  • Likely broader network compatibility due to chipset features.
  • Potentially more responsive user interface.

  • May be slightly more expensive than the Samsung E1200 Pusha.
  • Still a very basic feature phone with limited functionality.

Samsung E1200 Pusha

  • Extreme simplicity and ease of use.
  • Strong brand recognition (Samsung).
  • Potentially lower price point.

  • Outdated 156 MHz CPU may result in sluggish performance.
  • Limited future compatibility and software support.
  • Potentially restricted network compatibility.

Display Comparison

Neither device is expected to boast a high-resolution or vibrant display. Both will likely feature small, low-resolution color screens optimized for text readability and minimal power consumption. The Energizer E12, benefiting from a more modern chipset, *may* have slightly better display driver capabilities, resulting in marginally improved color reproduction, but this is speculative. Bezels will be substantial on both models, as display size is not a priority.

Camera Comparison

Both devices are likely to feature extremely basic cameras, primarily for capturing simple snapshots. Given the context data, detailed analysis is limited. Expect low resolution and poor image quality in all lighting conditions. The presence of a camera is more of a marketing feature than a practical benefit on both phones. Any camera comparison would be largely academic.

Performance

The core difference lies in the processing power. The Energizer Energy E12 utilizes the Spreadtrum SC6531E chipset, a system-on-a-chip (SoC) designed for basic feature phones, offering a more integrated and potentially efficient architecture than the Samsung E1200 Pusha’s standalone 156 MHz CPU. While the clock speed isn't directly comparable, the SC6531E integrates multiple components (CPU, GPU, modem) onto a single die, potentially leading to faster application loading times and smoother menu navigation. The older CPU in the Samsung E1200 Pusha will likely struggle with even basic tasks, and future software updates are unlikely.

Battery Life

Both phones are designed for exceptional battery life. The Spreadtrum SC6531E in the Energizer E12 is designed for low power consumption, but the Samsung E1200 Pusha’s older CPU architecture may offer even greater efficiency. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on network conditions and usage patterns (call frequency, SMS usage). Expect several days, potentially weeks, of standby time on both devices. Charging times will likely be slow via micro-USB on both models.

Buying Guide

Buy the Energizer Energy E12 if you need a feature phone with potentially broader network compatibility and a slightly more responsive user interface thanks to the Spreadtrum chipset. Buy the Samsung E1200 Pusha if you prioritize extreme simplicity, brand familiarity, and a potentially lower price point, accepting the limitations of its older CPU architecture and potentially limited feature set.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Samsung E1200 Pusha work on 4G/LTE networks?
No. The Samsung E1200 Pusha is a 2G-only device. It is designed for use on older GSM networks and will not connect to 4G or LTE networks. The Energizer E12, while also primarily 2G, *may* have limited 3G support depending on the specific variant.
❓ Can I use WhatsApp or Facebook on either of these phones?
Officially, no. WhatsApp and Facebook require a modern operating system (Android or iOS) which these feature phones lack. However, some limited versions of these apps *may* be available through Opera Mini or similar mobile browsers, but the experience will be severely restricted and unreliable.
❓ How easy is it to transfer contacts from a smartphone to the Samsung E1200 Pusha?
Transferring contacts is not straightforward. You'll likely need to export your contacts from your smartphone as a vCard (.vcf) file and then transfer it to the phone via Bluetooth (if supported) or by manually entering the numbers. The process is cumbersome compared to modern smartphones.