In a market dominated by smartphones, basic feature phones still hold appeal for their simplicity and longevity. We pit the Energizer E288s, equipped with a Mediatek MT6739WW chipset, against the ultra-basic Samsung E1200 Pusha, representing a legacy architecture, to determine if the newer hardware translates to a meaningfully improved user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a reliable feature phone, the Energizer E288s is the clear winner. Its Mediatek MT6739WW chipset provides a significantly more responsive experience, enabling features like potentially faster menu navigation and improved call handling compared to the Samsung E1200 Pusha’s antiquated 156 MHz processor.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | - |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April | 2012. Released 2012 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 138 x 58.2 x 12.8 mm (5.43 x 2.29 x 0.50 in) | 108 x 45 x 13.5 mm (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Mini-SIM |
| Weight | 116 g (4.09 oz) | 65.1 g (2.29 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~119 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~30.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.52 inches, 7.5 cm2 (~15.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | TFT, 65K colors |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz | 156 MHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739WW (28 nm) | - |
| OS | KaiOS 2.X | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | - |
| Phonebook | - | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 0.3 MP | - |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | No |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | GPS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | Proprietary |
| WLAN | Yes | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | - | No |
| Java | - | No |
| Messaging | - | SMS |
| Sensors | No | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 720 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 7 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 2000 mAh, removable | Removable Li-Ion 800 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White, Blue |
| Price | - | About 20 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) |
Energizer E288s
- Significantly faster processor for a smoother experience
- Potential for more features due to chipset capabilities
- More responsive user interface
- Slightly reduced battery life compared to the Samsung E1200 Pusha
- Likely a higher price point
Samsung E1200 Pusha
- Exceptional battery life due to ultra-low power consumption
- Extremely low cost
- Maximum simplicity
- Very slow and laggy performance
- Limited functionality
- Outdated user experience
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature low-resolution color displays typical of feature phones. However, the Energizer E288s’ chipset allows for more complex display drivers, potentially resulting in smoother animations and a more vibrant image, even if the underlying panel technology is similar. The Samsung E1200 Pusha’s display is constrained by its processor’s limited ability to refresh the screen quickly.
Camera Comparison
Given the nature of these devices, camera quality is not a primary concern. Both phones likely feature very basic cameras, and detailed specifications are unavailable. However, the Energizer E288s’ chipset could support slightly better image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in marginally improved image quality. It's unlikely either phone will produce photos suitable for anything beyond basic documentation.
Performance
The performance disparity is the defining factor here. The Energizer E288s’ Mediatek MT6739WW, a quad-core 1.3 GHz processor built on a 28nm process, represents a substantial leap over the Samsung E1200 Pusha’s 156 MHz CPU. This translates to faster menu navigation, quicker access to contacts, and a more responsive overall user interface. The 28nm process also implies better power efficiency compared to older architectures, though the impact will be lessened by the feature phone’s limited usage patterns. The Samsung E1200 Pusha will likely exhibit noticeable lag even with basic operations.
Battery Life
While both phones will offer excellent battery life due to their low power consumption, the Samsung E1200 Pusha will likely achieve significantly longer standby and talk times. Its extremely low-power processor draws minimal energy. The Energizer E288s, while more efficient than older processors, still consumes more power due to its higher processing capabilities. However, the benefit of a more responsive device may outweigh the slight reduction in battery life for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer E288s if you need a feature phone that feels less sluggish and potentially supports more modern features like basic app functionality (depending on software). Buy the Samsung E1200 Pusha if you prioritize extreme simplicity, maximum battery life (due to minimal power draw), and the lowest possible cost – accepting a very limited user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Energizer E288s be able to run any apps like WhatsApp or Facebook?
While the Mediatek MT6739WW chipset *could* theoretically support basic app functionality, it depends entirely on the software provided by Energizer. Feature phones typically run on simplified operating systems, and app support is not guaranteed. Don't expect a smartphone-like experience.
❓ Is the Samsung E1200 Pusha suitable for someone who is not tech-savvy?
Absolutely. The Samsung E1200 Pusha is designed for ultimate simplicity. Its limited features and slow processor mean there's very little to learn, making it ideal for users who prefer a straightforward device for calls and texts.
❓ How much faster is the Energizer E288s in real-world use compared to the Samsung E1200 Pusha?
The difference is substantial. The E288s will feel noticeably more responsive when navigating menus, accessing contacts, and composing messages. The E1200 Pusha will exhibit significant lag, making even simple tasks feel slow and frustrating.
