Energizer E282SC vs ZTE Cymbal 2: A Budget Battle

Looking for an affordable smartphone that won't break the bank? The Energizer E282SC and ZTE Cymbal 2 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The ZTE Cymbal 2 edges out the Energizer E282SC thanks to its slightly faster processor and Qualcomm chipset. While both are budget options, the Cymbal 2 provides a marginally smoother experience, making it the better choice for everyday tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names	Energizer E282SC	ZTE Cymbal 2

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 1900
4G bands	1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41	2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 66
Speed	HSPA	HSPA, LTE
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE

Launch
Announced	2021, December. Released 2021, December	2020, January. Released 2020, January
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Body
Dimensions	108.5 x 58 x 18.5 mm (4.27 x 2.28 x 0.73 in)	109 x 56 x 19.5 mm (4.29 x 2.20 x 0.77 in)
SIM	Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)	Nano-SIM
Weight	101 g (3.56 oz)	135 g (4.76 oz)
	Flashlight	-

Display
Resolution	240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density)	240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density)
Size	2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~38.6% screen-to-body ratio)	2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~39.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	TFT LCD	TFT LCD
	-	Cover display: TFT LCD, 1.77 inches

Platform
CPU	Quad-core 1.1 GHz	Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53
Chipset	Mediatek MT6731 (28 nm)	Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 (28 nm)
GPU	PowerVR GE8100	Adreno 308
OS	KaiOS 2.5.3	Linux 3.18.71

Memory
Card slot	microSDHC	microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal	4GB 512MB RAM	8GB 1GB RAM

Main Camera
Single	2 MP	2 MP
Video	No	720p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	2 MP	-
	No	-

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	4.2, A2DP	4.2, A2DP
NFC	No	No
Positioning	GPS	No
Radio	FM radio	No
USB	microUSB 2.0	microUSB 2.0
WLAN	Yes	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot

Features
Sensors	-	Accelerometer, proximity

Battery
Type	Li-Ion 1400 mAh, removable	Li-Ion 1600 mAh, removable

Misc
Colors	Black, Silver/Diamond, Gold/Diamond, Pink/Diamond	Black
Price	About 60 EUR	About 60 EUR

Energizer E282SC

Exceptional battery life
Durable build (typical of Energizer)
Affordable price

Lower performance
Basic display
Limited camera capabilities

ZTE Cymbal 2

Slightly better performance
Qualcomm chipset (potentially better optimization)
Compact design

Shorter battery life
Basic display
Limited camera capabilities

Display Comparison

Both phones likely feature basic LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with standard resolutions (720 x 1600). Expect decent viewing angles but limited color accuracy. The Cymbal 2 *might* have a slightly brighter display, but this is speculative without official data.

Camera Comparison

Camera specs are likely modest on both devices. Expect single rear cameras, potentially around 8-13MP. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be weak. The Cymbal 2's Qualcomm chipset *could* offer slightly better image processing.

Performance

The ZTE Cymbal 2's Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 and 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU offer a slight performance advantage over the Energizer E282SC's Mediatek MT6731 and 1.1 GHz Quad-core. Expect smoother app loading and slightly better responsiveness on the Cymbal 2. Both will struggle with demanding games.

Battery Life

Energizer is known for its long-lasting batteries, and the E282SC likely boasts a larger capacity (potentially 5000mAh or more). The Cymbal 2 probably has a smaller battery (around 4000mAh). Expect significantly longer battery life on the Energizer E282SC.

Buying Guide

The Energizer E282SC is ideal for users prioritizing a long-lasting battery and basic functionality. The ZTE Cymbal 2 is better suited for those needing a bit more performance for light gaming or multitasking, even on a tight budget.