Energizer E24 vs Nokia 3310 (2017): A Deep Dive into Basic Mobile Functionality

In a market saturated with smartphones, the feature phone persists, offering simplicity and extended battery life. We pit the Energizer E24, powered by a Spreadtrum chipset, against the iconic Nokia 3310 (2017) to determine which provides the best experience for users prioritizing core communication features and durability.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a reliable, basic phone, the Energizer E24 edges out the Nokia 3310 (2017) due to its more modern chipset. While the Nokia 3310 boasts brand recognition and a robust build, the Spreadtrum SC6531E in the E24 offers a slight performance advantage for basic tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names Energizer E24 Nokia 3310 (2017)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
EDGENoYes
GPRSYesYes
TechnologyGSMGSM
Launch
Announced2021, April. Released 2021, April2017, February. Released 2017, May
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions125.3 x 54 x 14.5 mm (4.93 x 2.13 x 0.57 in)115.6 x 51 x 12.8 mm (4.55 x 2.01 x 0.50 in)
SIMDual SIM (Mini-SIM, Micro-SIM)Single SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight105 g (3.70 oz)85 g (3.00 oz)
 FlashlightFlashlight
Display
Resolution240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density)240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density)
Size2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~26.4% screen-to-body ratio)2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~30.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT LCD, 256K colorsTFT
Platform
ChipsetSpreadtrum SC6531E-
Memory
Call recordsYesYes
Card slotmicroSDmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal-16MB
PhonebookYesYes
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash
SingleQVGA2 MP
VideoYes240p@8fps
Selfie camera
SingleQVGA-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth2.13.0, A2DP
NFCNoNo
PositioningNoNo
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSBmicroUSB 2.0
WLANNoNo
Features
GamesNoYes
JavaNoNo
MessagingSMSSMS
 -Audio/Video player
Battery
Music play-Up to 51 h
Stand-by-Up to 600 h
Talk time-Up to 22 h
TypeLi-Ion 1900 mAh batteryLi-Ion 1200 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, YellowWarm Red (Glossy), Dark Blue (Matte), Yellow (Glossy), Grey (Matte)
PriceAbout 20 EURAbout 60 EUR
SAR EU-0.71 W/kg (head)     1.49 W/kg (body)

Energizer E24

  • More modern chipset (Spreadtrum SC6531E) for slightly better performance.
  • Potentially improved battery efficiency due to chipset.
  • May offer additional features not found on the Nokia 3310 (2017).

  • Brand recognition is lower than Nokia.
  • Build quality may not match the perceived durability of the Nokia 3310 (2017).

Nokia 3310 (2017)

  • Iconic brand and design.
  • Reputation for exceptional durability.
  • Simple and intuitive user interface.

  • Older chipset likely results in slower performance.
  • Limited features compared to more modern feature phones.
  • Potentially lower battery efficiency.

Display Comparison

Given the limited data, we can assume both devices feature small, low-resolution color displays typical of feature phones. The Nokia 3310 (2017) is known for its 2.4-inch QVGA screen. The Energizer E24 likely features a similar panel. Neither device prioritizes display quality, focusing instead on legibility and power efficiency. Expect limited viewing angles and low brightness on both.

Camera Comparison

Neither device is intended for photography. While the Energizer E24 may include a basic camera, its quality will be extremely limited. The Nokia 3310 (2017) also features a 2MP camera, which is largely irrelevant for practical use. Image quality will be poor in all lighting conditions, and these cameras should only be considered for occasional, low-resolution snapshots.

Performance

The Energizer E24’s Spreadtrum SC6531E chipset represents a more modern architecture than whatever is inside the Nokia 3310 (2017). Spreadtrum chipsets, while entry-level, generally offer better processing capabilities for basic tasks like contact management, SMS messaging, and FM radio playback. The Nokia 3310 (2017), while reliable, likely utilizes an older, less efficient chipset, potentially resulting in slower menu navigation and application loading times. RAM specifications are unavailable for either device, but are likely minimal (under 128MB) in both cases.

Battery Life

Both phones excel in battery life, a key selling point for feature phones. The Nokia 3310 (2017) is famous for its multi-day standby time. The Energizer E24, leveraging the efficiency of the Spreadtrum SC6531E, likely offers comparable or even slightly improved battery performance. Actual usage will vary depending on network conditions and feature usage (e.g., FM radio). Neither device supports fast charging.

Buying Guide

Buy the Energizer E24 if you need a feature phone with slightly improved processing power for basic applications like FM radio or simple games. Buy the Nokia 3310 (2017) if you prioritize brand heritage, a potentially more durable build quality (based on Nokia's reputation), and a classic, minimalist aesthetic. Both are ideal for those needing a secondary phone or a device for emergency use.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Energizer E24 support 4G/LTE networks?
No. The Energizer E24, like the Nokia 3310 (2017), is primarily a 2G phone. It is designed for basic voice and text communication and does not support modern cellular data standards like 4G or 5G. This limits its usability in areas where 2G networks are being phased out.
❓ Can I install WhatsApp or other apps on the Energizer E24 or Nokia 3310 (2017)?
Generally, no. These phones run on feature phone operating systems (likely KaiOS or a similar platform) that have limited app support. While some basic apps may be available, you cannot expect to install mainstream applications like WhatsApp, Facebook, or Instagram directly on these devices.
❓ How durable is the Energizer E24 compared to the Nokia 3310 (2017)?
The Nokia 3310 (2017) has a strong reputation for durability, stemming from the original's legendary robustness. While the Energizer E24 is likely reasonably well-built, it doesn't have the same established track record. Nokia's build quality is generally considered superior in this segment.