In a market saturated with expensive smartphones, the Energizer E24 and Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition represent a return to simplicity. Both are ultra-budget 4G feature phones aimed at users prioritizing call quality, long battery life, and basic connectivity over advanced features. This comparison dissects their core differences, focusing on the Energizer's known chipset and extrapolating from Nokia's established feature phone lineage.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users needing a reliable 4G connection and a slightly more modern chipset, the Energizer E24 emerges as the better choice. Its Spreadtrum SC6531E offers a more capable platform than the likely older architecture within the Nokia 105 4G, even if both phones excel at core functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April. Released 2021, April | 2024, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, December |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 125.3 x 54 x 14.5 mm (4.93 x 2.13 x 0.57 in) | 121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, Micro-SIM) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 105 g (3.70 oz) | 93 g (3.28 oz) |
| | Flashlight | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~26.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 256K colors | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| Chipset | Spreadtrum SC6531E | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | Yes | Yes |
| Card slot | microSD | microSDHC |
| Internal | - | 48MB 128MB RAM |
| Phonebook | Yes | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | QVGA | - |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio |
| USB | microUSB | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | No | Yes |
| Java | No | No |
| Messaging | SMS | SMS |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1900 mAh battery | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow | Charcoal |
| Price | About 20 EUR | About 50 EUR |
Energizer E24
- Known 4G chipset (Spreadtrum SC6531E) for better compatibility
- Potentially more efficient 4G data usage
- Likely better VoLTE/VoWiFi support
- Energizer brand recognition is lower than Nokia
- Specific display and battery specs are unknown
Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition
- Strong Nokia brand reputation for durability
- Minimalist user interface
- Potentially longer standby time due to simpler chipset
- Likely older chipset architecture
- Potentially less efficient 4G data usage
- May lack advanced 4G features like VoLTE/VoWiFi
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-resolution or particularly vibrant display. Both will likely feature a color LCD panel, prioritizing readability over visual fidelity. Given Nokia's history, the 105 4G likely employs a slightly more refined display coating for outdoor visibility, but the Energizer E24's display size is unknown, making a direct comparison difficult. Expect both to prioritize power efficiency over brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature a basic camera, primarily for capturing simple snapshots. Image quality will be limited by the sensor size and image processing capabilities. Given the price point, expecting detailed or high-quality images is unrealistic. The focus is on functionality, not photography. Any camera on either device is a bonus, not a selling point.
Performance
The Energizer E24's Spreadtrum SC6531E chipset is the defining performance differentiator. This chipset, while not powerful, provides a modern 4G modem and a more efficient architecture than the likely older chipset found in the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition. The Nokia 105 4G likely relies on a chipset designed for 2G/3G with added 4G capability, potentially leading to higher power consumption during 4G usage. The SC6531E's inclusion suggests better VoLTE and VoWiFi support, crucial for modern network compatibility. RAM capacity is likely similar on both, sufficient for basic phone functions but limiting multitasking.
Battery Life
Both the Energizer E24 and Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition prioritize exceptional battery life. The Energizer E24's Spreadtrum chipset, while offering 4G, is designed for low power consumption. The Nokia 105 4G, with its potentially less demanding chipset, may offer slightly longer standby times. However, the difference will likely be marginal, with both phones easily lasting several days on a single charge with moderate use. Charging times will be slow, likely several hours via micro-USB.
Buying Guide
Buy the Energizer E24 if you need a feature phone with a known 4G chipset for potentially better network compatibility and future-proofing. Buy the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition if you prioritize brand reputation for durability and a minimalist user experience, and are less concerned with the underlying chipset technology.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Energizer E24 work with my carrier's 4G network in the US?
The Spreadtrum SC6531E chipset supports a range of 4G bands. However, compatibility depends on your carrier's specific frequencies. Check your carrier's website or contact them directly to confirm compatibility before purchasing.
❓ Is the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition a good choice for someone who rarely uses data?
Yes, the Nokia 105 4G is an excellent choice for users primarily needing a phone for calls and texts. Its minimalist design and long battery life make it ideal for basic communication, even with infrequent data usage.
❓ Can I use WhatsApp or Facebook on either of these phones?
While technically possible, the experience will be limited. These phones have limited RAM and processing power. WhatsApp and Facebook Lite may function, but performance will be slow and unreliable. Don't expect a smooth social media experience.
