Doogee X97 vs Samsung Galaxy A04e: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Shoppers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A04e is the better choice. While both phones utilize Mediatek’s budget-focused Helio series, the A04e’s Helio P35, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the X97’s quad-core Helio A22, making it more capable for multitasking and demanding apps.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee X97 | Samsung Galaxy A04e |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.9 x 9.7 mm (6.38 x 3.03 x 0.38 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~74.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Triple-LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | About 100 EUR | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Doogee X97
- Potentially longer software support (Doogee's commitment is evolving)
- Lower price point (likely)
- Simple, straightforward Android experience
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Struggles with multitasking
- Limited gaming capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Octa-core processor for smoother performance
- Samsung’s brand reputation and software ecosystem
- Better multitasking capabilities
- May have shorter software support compared to Doogee
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Bloatware (common on Samsung devices)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price point. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but functionality. Without specific display specs, we can assume both offer basic 720p+ resolutions. The A04e’s slightly higher processing power *could* translate to smoother scrolling, but the difference will be minimal. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Both are likely to feature a primary camera alongside basic depth or macro sensors. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions but suffer in low light. The A04e *may* benefit from slightly better image processing capabilities due to its more powerful chipset, but the difference will likely be marginal. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Samsung Galaxy A04e’s Mediatek Helio P35 is an octa-core processor, featuring four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This configuration allows for more efficient task handling compared to the Doogee X97’s Mediatek Helio A22, which utilizes a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. The A04e’s octa-core design excels in multi-threaded applications and multitasking, offering a more fluid user experience. While both chips are built on a 12nm process, the architectural advantage of the P35 is significant. The X97 will struggle with more than a few apps open simultaneously.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. Both devices likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for budget smartphones. The Helio P35 in the A04e, while more powerful, may consume slightly more power than the A22 in the X97. However, the A04e’s faster processor could complete tasks quicker, potentially offsetting some of the increased power draw. Charging speeds are likely to be slow on both, with standard 5W or 10W charging being the norm. Expect 0-100% charge times to exceed 3 hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee X97 if you need a phone primarily for basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and prioritize a potentially longer software support lifespan from a smaller brand. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A04e if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks, benefit from Samsung’s established brand reputation and software ecosystem, and anticipate using more demanding applications.