The Doogee X96 and Nokia C200 represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum, targeting users who prioritize affordability above all else. Both devices aim to deliver a functional Android experience, but significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate which phone offers the better value and user experience. This comparison focuses on the core performance and efficiency trade-offs between the Unisoc SC9863A in the X96 and the MediaTek Helio A22 in the C200.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a basic smartphone experience, the Doogee X96 is the better choice. While both phones offer similar 10W charging, the X96’s Unisoc SC9863A, built on a smaller 28nm process, provides a more modern CPU architecture and potentially better sustained performance than the Nokia C200’s older Helio A22.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 30 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 11 | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 76.7 x 9.7 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.38 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Quad | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5400 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Meteor Black |
| Models | - | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
Doogee X96
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A55)
- Octa-core processor for better multitasking
- Potentially better power efficiency due to 28nm process
- Lower peak CPU clock speed compared to the Helio A22
- Limited information available on display quality
Nokia C200
- Higher peak CPU clock speed (2.0 GHz)
- Nokia’s reputation for software updates (though limited)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A53)
- Quad-core processor may struggle with multitasking
- Less efficient 12nm process
Display Comparison
Neither Doogee nor Nokia provide display specifications beyond the basic panel size. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut makes direct comparison impossible. The user experience will likely be similar, with neither phone excelling in visual fidelity. Expect basic viewing angles and color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to feature basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a meaningful comparison. Given the price bracket, image quality will likely be limited, particularly in low-light conditions. Expect basic functionality for casual snapshots, but not professional-grade photography. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device further limits their low-light capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee X96’s Unisoc SC9863A is an octa-core processor featuring a mix of Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6GHz and 1.2GHz. This contrasts with the Nokia C200’s MediaTek Helio A22, a quad-core processor with Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0GHz. While the A22 has a higher clock speed, the A53 architecture is older and less efficient than the A55. The 28nm process of the SC9863A is also more advanced than the Helio A22’s 12nm process, potentially leading to better power efficiency and sustained performance. The X96’s octa-core configuration should also provide better multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Both the Doogee X96 and Nokia C200 utilize 10W wired charging. Battery capacity is not specified in the provided data, but both are likely to feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Unisoc SC9863A’s potentially better power efficiency could translate to slightly longer battery life for the X96, despite the similar charging speeds. Expect a full charge to take several hours with the included 10W charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee X96 if you need a phone capable of handling slightly more demanding tasks, such as light multitasking or occasional social media browsing, and appreciate a more modern chipset architecture. Buy the Nokia C200 if you prioritize a simple, no-frills experience and are primarily focused on basic communication features like calls and messaging, and prefer the Nokia brand reputation for software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the Doogee X96 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Unisoc SC9863A is an entry-level chipset, its octa-core configuration and Cortex-A55 architecture should be sufficient for running basic apps like Facebook and WhatsApp. However, expect some lag or slowdowns when multitasking or using more demanding features within these apps. The Nokia C200’s Helio A22 may experience even more noticeable performance limitations.
❓ Is the Nokia C200 a good choice for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Nokia C200 is a suitable option for users who primarily need a phone for basic communication. Its Helio A22 chipset is adequate for making calls, sending texts, and using simple contact management features. However, if you anticipate using any apps beyond these core functions, the Doogee X96 offers a more versatile experience.
❓ Can either of these phones handle mobile gaming?
Neither the Doogee X96 nor the Nokia C200 are designed for mobile gaming. While they may be able to run very basic 2D games, they will struggle with more demanding 3D titles. Expect low frame rates, significant lag, and potential crashes. These phones are not suitable for gamers.
