The Doogee X95 and Nokia 3.4 represent the lower end of the Android smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. However, they diverge significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects the differences between the Mediatek Helio A22 in the Doogee X95 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 in the Nokia 3.4, revealing which phone delivers a smoother experience for everyday tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 3.4 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 460 chipset, featuring octa-core processing, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Doogee X95’s quad-core Helio A22. While both offer similar 10W charging, the Nokia 3.4’s superior processing power justifies the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 13, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, May | 2020, September 22. Released 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 167 x 77.4 x 8.9 mm (6.57 x 3.05 x 0.35 in) | 161 x 76 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 540 x 1200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~202 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~79.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761V Helio A22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
2 MP, (telephoto)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 4350 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Fjord, Dusk, Charcoal |
| Models | - | TA-1288, TA-1285, TA-1283 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.83 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) |
Doogee X95
- Lowest possible price point
- Simple and easy to use
- Potentially longer standby time due to less powerful processor
- Slow performance for multitasking
- Struggles with demanding apps
- Limited future-proofing
Nokia 3.4
- Significantly faster performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- More responsive user interface
- Slightly higher price
- 10W charging is slow
- May not be ideal for extremely light users
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The key difference lies under the hood: processing power impacts UI smoothness. While neither spec sheet details brightness or color accuracy, the Nokia 3.4’s more capable chipset will contribute to faster rendering of the user interface, making scrolling and animations feel more fluid.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature modest camera setups, and detailed sensor information is absent. Given the price point, image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing. However, the Nokia 3.4’s more powerful chipset will allow for faster image processing and potentially better noise reduction. The Doogee X95’s Helio A22 may struggle with complex image algorithms, resulting in softer images and slower capture times. It's reasonable to assume both will include a primary sensor and potentially a depth or macro lens, but focusing on the processing power is more relevant than sensor resolution at this price.
Performance
The Nokia 3.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 is the clear winner here. Built on an 11nm process, it features an octa-core configuration (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) compared to the Doogee X95’s quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 and 12nm Helio A22. The Cortex-A73 cores in the Snapdragon 460 offer significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The additional cores also improve multitasking capabilities. The 11nm process node also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life under load.
Battery Life
Both devices are equipped with 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds – expect around 2.5-3 hours for a full charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 460’s improved power efficiency in the Nokia 3.4 could translate to slightly longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Doogee X95. The Helio A22, while less powerful, may consume less power during idle usage, but the difference will likely be minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee X95 if you need a phone for extremely basic tasks – calls, texts, and light social media – and prioritize absolute minimum cost. It’s suitable for first-time smartphone users or as a temporary device. Buy the Nokia 3.4 if you prefer a more responsive experience for multitasking, streaming video, and casual gaming, and value a chipset that will remain usable for a longer period.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Doogee X95 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Doogee X95’s Helio A22 chipset is a basic processor. While it can run apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, you may experience noticeable lag when scrolling through feeds, loading images, or switching between apps. It’s best suited for light usage of these platforms.
❓ Can the Nokia 3.4 handle any mobile games?
The Nokia 3.4’s Snapdragon 460 is capable of running some mobile games, but don’t expect high frame rates or graphics settings. Simple 2D games and less demanding 3D titles will be playable, but more intensive games like PUBG Mobile will likely require significant compromises in graphics quality to achieve a smooth experience.
❓ Is the 10W charging on either phone a significant drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is quite slow by modern standards. Both phones will take over two and a half hours to fully charge from 0%. This isn’t ideal if you frequently need to top up your battery quickly, but it’s typical for phones in this price range.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates?
Nokia generally provides better software support than Doogee. Nokia’s commitment to Android One means the 3.4 is likely to receive more timely security updates and potentially even a version upgrade, extending its usable lifespan.
