The Doogee X93 and Nokia C210 represent the lower end of the Android smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. However, a significant disparity exists under the hood. This comparison dissects the core differences between the Mediatek MT6580-powered Doogee X93 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662-equipped Nokia C210, revealing which device delivers a more responsive and future-proof experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia C210 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset, built on an 11nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Doogee X93’s older, 28nm Mediatek MT6580. While both phones cater to basic needs, the Nokia C210 provides a smoother, more capable experience for everyday tasks and light multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, August | 2023, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 156 x 73.8 x 9.8 mm (6.14 x 2.91 x 0.39 in) | 159.5 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.28 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 167.8 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 600 x 1280 pixels (~232 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~273 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 92.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Triple | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Yes |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 4350 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Gray |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 190 EUR |
Doogee X93
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Significantly slower performance
- Outdated chipset architecture
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Poor gaming performance
Nokia C210
- Faster and more responsive performance
- More efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Improved gaming experience
- More future-proof
- Likely a higher price tag
- 10W charging is still relatively slow
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Specifics like panel type (IPS vs. TFT) and resolution are missing, but both likely target a 720p+ resolution given the price bracket. The key difference lies in the processing power driving the display; the Snapdragon 662’s integrated GPU will handle UI animations and video playback more fluidly. While neither phone is likely to offer high brightness, the Nokia C210’s more modern chipset may allow for better image processing and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar in real-world usage, as both phones likely feature basic sensors. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, the Snapdragon 662’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced, potentially offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Doogee X93’s older chipset will likely result in slower image processing times and less refined image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn’t heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The performance gap is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The Mediatek MT6580, a quad-core processor built on a 28nm node, is significantly outdated. Its Cortex-A7 cores struggle with modern workloads. Conversely, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 features an octa-core configuration (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) fabricated on an 11nm process. This translates to substantially faster processing speeds and improved power efficiency. The Snapdragon 662’s architecture allows for better multitasking and smoother operation of demanding apps. Gamers will find the Nokia C210 far more capable, even if limited to lower settings.
Battery Life
Both phones feature modest 10W wired charging. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the target market, both are likely in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Snapdragon 662’s superior power efficiency will likely translate to longer battery life on the Nokia C210, despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Doogee X93. The 10W charging speed on both devices is slow, requiring several hours for a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee X93 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price point and your smartphone usage is limited to calls, texts, and very basic app usage. Buy the Nokia C210 if you value a more responsive user experience, smoother multitasking, and the ability to run modern apps without significant lag, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek MT6580 in the Doogee X93 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6580 is a very basic processor. While it can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag, slow loading times, and occasional crashes, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. The Nokia C210’s Snapdragon 662 will handle these apps much more smoothly.
❓ Can the Nokia C210 handle any mobile games?
The Nokia C210, with its Snapdragon 662, can handle less demanding mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty: Mobile, but you’ll likely need to play on low graphics settings and accept occasional frame drops. The Doogee X93 will struggle with even basic 3D games.
❓ Is the 10W charging on either phone sufficient for daily use?
No, 10W charging is quite slow. Expect several hours to fully charge either device. It’s best to charge overnight. While not ideal, it’s typical for phones in this price range.
❓ How does the age of the Mediatek MT6580 affect software updates for the Doogee X93?
The Mediatek MT6580 is an older chipset, meaning Doogee may provide fewer software updates and security patches for the X93 compared to the Nokia C210, which benefits from Qualcomm’s longer support cycles.
