The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Doogee X93 and the Infinix Smart 5 Pro aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly affordable price point. However, significant differences in their core processing power dictate which device is better suited for various user needs. This comparison will dissect those differences, focusing on real-world performance implications.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Infinix Smart 5 Pro is the better choice. Its octa-core Unisoc SC9863A processor provides a substantial performance uplift over the Doogee X93’s quad-core Mediatek MT6580, making everyday tasks smoother and more efficient. While both offer basic functionality, the Infinix delivers a more modern user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, August | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August | Available. Released 2021, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 156 x 73.8 x 9.8 mm (6.14 x 2.91 x 0.39 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 600 x 1280 pixels (~232 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 92.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition), XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Triple | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 4350 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Morandi Green, Heart of Ocean |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 70 EUR |
Doogee X93
- Extremely affordable price point
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Functional for basic communication
- Significantly underpowered processor
- Poor multitasking performance
- Limited app compatibility
Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Octa-core processor for smoother performance
- Better multitasking capabilities
- More responsive user experience
- Still a budget device with limitations
- Camera quality is likely basic
- 10W charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 28nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on cost reduction over display quality. Specific display specs (resolution, panel type, brightness) are not provided, but given the price bracket, users should expect a basic LCD panel. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, prioritizing power efficiency over vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both feature low-resolution primary sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing will be basic, prioritizing speed over detail and dynamic range. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but poor performance in low light.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s Unisoc SC9863A is an octa-core processor, featuring four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and four at 1.2 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Doogee X93’s Mediatek MT6580, a quad-core processor with Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz. The architectural advantage of the A55 cores, combined with the higher core count, translates to significantly better multi-tasking and app launch speeds on the Infinix. While both are 28nm, the newer architecture of the Unisoc chip provides a performance edge. The Doogee X93 will struggle with even moderately demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds – expect around 2.5-3 hours for a full charge. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the focus on affordability, both likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The more efficient Unisoc SC9863A in the Infinix Smart 5 Pro may offer slightly better battery life due to its optimized power consumption, despite potentially having a similar capacity battery to the Doogee X93.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee X93 if you need a very basic smartphone for calls, texts, and extremely light app usage, and prioritize simplicity above all else. It's a functional device for those with minimal smartphone requirements. Buy the Infinix Smart 5 Pro if you prefer a more responsive experience for social media, web browsing, and light multitasking. The octa-core processor offers a noticeable improvement in usability for a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek MT6580 in the Doogee X93 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6580 is a very basic processor. While it can run these apps, expect noticeable lag and slow loading times, especially with multiple apps open. The experience won't be fluid or enjoyable for frequent users.
❓ Is the Unisoc SC9863A in the Infinix Smart 5 Pro capable of playing mobile games?
The Unisoc SC9863A can handle very light mobile games, but don't expect to play demanding titles like PUBG or Call of Duty at high settings. Frame rates will likely be low, and you may experience stuttering. It's suitable for casual gaming only.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones with the 10W charging?
Expect approximately 2.5 to 3 hours to fully charge both the Doogee X93 and the Infinix Smart 5 Pro using the included 10W chargers. This is a standard charging speed for phones in this price range.
❓ Does the Infinix Smart 5 Pro support software updates?
Software update support for the Infinix Smart 5 Pro is limited. While it likely shipped with a version of Android Go Edition, major Android version updates are unlikely. Expect security patches to be infrequent.
