Doogee V40 vs Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and future-proofing, the Doogee V40 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a performance edge and superior efficiency. However, users who heavily value wireless charging convenience may find the Cat S75 a suitable alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V40 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 183.4 x 83.7 x 15.5 mm (7.22 x 3.30 x 0.61 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~71.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.78", 2 infrared night vision lights 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0" | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 8680 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black/Red | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | - | About 600 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 131:56h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee V40
- Exceptional battery life (131:56h endurance)
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging with reverse wired charging
- Lacks wireless charging
- Camera specifications are unknown
Cat S75
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Potentially better outdoor visibility (speculation)
- Older and less efficient Dimensity 930 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life compared to the V40
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged nature of both phones, we can assume both utilize durable, scratch-resistant glass. The Cat S75's brand history suggests a focus on outdoor visibility, potentially indicating higher peak brightness. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to determine a clear winner, but the S75 likely prioritizes usability in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, the market segment suggests both phones will prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. We can assume both will feature a main sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The absence of sensor size or aperture information prevents a meaningful analysis. The Cat S75's brand positioning might lean towards more natural image processing, while Doogee often emphasizes vibrant, saturated colors.
Performance
The Doogee V40’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Cat S75’s Dimensity 930 (6nm). The smaller node size translates directly to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While the Cat S75’s CPU configuration includes 2x Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, the V40 counters with 4x Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, offering a substantial advantage in multi-threaded tasks. This means the V40 will handle demanding applications and multitasking more smoothly. The V40’s newer chipset also benefits from advancements in the GPU, providing a better gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Doogee V40’s battery endurance of 131:56h is a standout feature, dwarfing what is typically seen in smartphones. This is coupled with a 1200 cycle lifespan, indicating long-term battery health. While the Cat S75 offers the convenience of 15W wireless charging, it lacks the V40’s exceptional endurance. The V40’s 33W wired charging is faster than the S75’s implied slower wired charging (given the focus on wireless), allowing for quicker top-ups when needed. The V40’s superior battery life is a major advantage for users who spend extended periods away from power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V40 if you need a phone that will last for days on a single charge, and you anticipate using demanding applications or gaming. Its newer chipset provides a performance advantage and better thermal management. Buy the Cat S75 if you prioritize the convenience of wireless charging and prefer a slightly more established brand in the rugged phone space, accepting a trade-off in raw processing power and battery endurance.