The rugged smartphone market is heating up, offering increasingly powerful devices capable of withstanding harsh conditions. The Doogee V40 Pro and Ulefone Armor 17 Pro represent two compelling options, but they take different approaches to performance and efficiency. The V40 Pro leverages a newer, more efficient chipset, while the Armor 17 Pro prioritizes rapid charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and long-term battery health, the Doogee V40 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant advantage in efficiency and processing power over the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Helio G99. While the Ulefone boasts faster charging, the Doogee’s superior endurance and processing capabilities make it the better all-around choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 07 | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 25 | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| | - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m
MIL-STD-810G compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels* (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.47", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.4"
20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 1/2.78", 2 infrared night vision lights
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0" | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.7" | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | MagSafe compatible accessories |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
Reverse wired | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min
15W wireless
Wireless reversed |
| Type | 8680 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Silver | Black |
| Price | About 510 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 131:56h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee V40 Pro
- Superior chipset performance with the Dimensity 7300
- Exceptional battery endurance (131:56h)
- More efficient 4nm manufacturing process
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Ultra-fast 66W wired charging (53% in 15 min)
- Convenient 15W wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful Helio G99 chipset
- Lower overall performance and efficiency
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided in the context data, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points and target audience, both likely feature durable, high-brightness LCD panels. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to accommodate the ruggedized design.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but we can infer that both phones will feature multi-camera setups geared towards outdoor photography. The absence of information prevents a detailed analysis. However, the focus for rugged phones is often on durability and usability rather than cutting-edge camera technology. Expect both to offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee V40 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a clear step up from the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Helio G99 (6nm). The 4nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the V40 Pro will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The Dimensity 7300’s octa-core configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) also boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores compared to the Armor 17 Pro’s (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55), resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. While both utilize octa-core CPUs, the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 7300 are substantial.
Battery Life
The Doogee V40 Pro boasts an impressive 131:56h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s capacity isn’t specified, its 66W wired charging is a significant advantage, capable of reaching 53% charge in just 15 minutes. The V40 Pro’s 33W charging is considerably slower. However, the V40 Pro’s superior efficiency, coupled with a likely larger battery capacity, may offset the slower charging speed for users who prioritize longevity over quick top-ups. The Ulefone also offers 15W wireless and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Doogee.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V40 Pro if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or extended outdoor use where consistent performance is crucial. Its more powerful chipset and impressive 131:56h battery endurance will keep you going. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you prioritize quick top-ups and frequently find yourself needing to rapidly recharge your device, and your workload is less intensive, focusing on communication and basic app usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7300 in the Doogee V40 Pro get noticeably hotter than the Helio G99 during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7300 is more powerful, its 4nm process is significantly more efficient. This means it will generate less heat for a given level of performance compared to the Helio G99’s 6nm process. Therefore, the V40 Pro is likely to experience less thermal throttling and maintain higher frame rates for longer periods during gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Doogee V40 Pro in a real-world scenario?
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s 66W charging can add approximately 53% charge in 15 minutes. The Doogee V40 Pro’s 33W charging will take considerably longer to achieve the same level of charge, likely around 30-45 minutes. This makes the Ulefone ideal for users who frequently need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Doogee V40 Pro's longer battery endurance translate to multiple days of use on a single charge with moderate usage?
The 131:56h endurance rating suggests that with moderate usage – including calls, messaging, and occasional social media – the Doogee V40 Pro could realistically last for two to three days on a single charge. However, heavy usage with demanding apps or prolonged screen-on time will reduce this significantly.
