Doogee V30 vs Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Doogee V30 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 900 chipset offers a significant leap over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. However, the BV9200’s brighter display and potentially more refined rugged build quality make it a viable alternative for those less concerned with peak processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V30 | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 12 | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 22 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 178.4 x 83.1 x 18.3 mm (7.02 x 3.27 x 0.72 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 376 g (13.26 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 16 MP, f/2.2, 130˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 55% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | 10800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Orange, Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Doogee V30
- Significantly more powerful processor (Dimensity 900)
- Faster wired charging (66W, 55% in 30 min)
- More efficient 6nm chipset for better battery life
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Rugged design details not fully available
Blackview BV9200
- Brighter display (481 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Higher contrast ratio (1423:1) for vibrant visuals
- 30W wireless charging
- Less powerful processor (Helio G96)
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 481 nits and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, suggesting a more vibrant and readable experience, particularly in direct sunlight. The Doogee V30’s display specifications are currently unavailable, but given its focus on internal power, it’s likely to prioritize performance over display fidelity. The BV9200’s contrast ratio indicates deeper blacks, enhancing media consumption. Users who frequently use their phones outdoors or view content in bright environments will likely find the BV9200’s display superior.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it impossible to determine a clear winner. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but image quality will heavily depend on the quality of the image signal processor (ISP) within each chipset. We'd expect the Dimensity 900 in the V30 to offer a more advanced ISP.
Performance
The Doogee V30’s Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 900’s architecture – featuring 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – provides a significant performance boost over the G96’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 6nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This means the V30 will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and consistency. The G96 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with more intensive operations.
Battery Life
Both the Doogee V30 and Blackview BV9200 support 66W wired charging, promising rapid replenishment. The V30 claims 55% charge in 30 minutes, while the BV9200’s charging time is not specified. The BV9200 also offers 30W wireless charging, a feature the V30 matches with 15W wireless charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster wired charging of the V30, combined with the more efficient Dimensity 900 chipset, suggests it may offer comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V30 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, extended gaming sessions, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its superior chipset and faster charging will be invaluable. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize a brighter, more visible display for outdoor use and appreciate a potentially more durable, time-tested rugged design, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.