Doogee V20 Pro vs. Motorola Defy 2: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Defy 2 emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 930 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Doogee V20 Pro’s Dimensity 700. However, the V20 Pro’s 33W wired charging provides a faster top-up than the Defy 2’s wireless-only solution.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V20 Pro | Motorola Defy 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | 2, 5, 23, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 28 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 01 | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 170.5 x 81.2 x 14 mm (6.71 x 3.20 x 0.55 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 296 g (10.44 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 24 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Orange, Blue | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 570 EUR |
Doogee V20 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Rugged design for durability
- Older Dimensity 700 chipset
- Potentially lower performance
- Likely less efficient power consumption
Motorola Defy 2
- More powerful Dimensity 930 chipset
- 6nm process for better efficiency
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Slower charging speed (wireless only)
- Potentially shorter battery life due to higher performance
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, we can infer the Doogee V20 Pro likely utilizes an LCD panel to keep costs down. The Motorola Defy 2, being a more recent release, may incorporate a higher-quality panel, potentially with improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of details like refresh rate or peak brightness makes a definitive statement impossible, but the Defy 2’s newer chipset suggests a greater potential for a more advanced display.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Dimensity 930 in the Motorola Defy 2 includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing, better noise reduction, and improved dynamic range. While both phones likely feature a primary camera, the Defy 2’s ISP will likely deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) prevents a more granular analysis.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Defy 2’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm) represents a significant step up from the Doogee V20 Pro’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal characteristics, translating to sustained performance under load. While both CPUs feature the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Defy 2 boasts Cortex-A78 performance cores versus the V20 Pro’s A76 cores, providing a tangible boost in single-core and multi-core performance. This benefits demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, making the Defy 2 the clear winner for users who push their phones.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the charging methods differ significantly. The Doogee V20 Pro supports 33W wired charging, allowing for a relatively quick 0-100% charge. Conversely, the Motorola Defy 2 relies solely on 15W wireless charging. While wireless charging offers convenience, it’s considerably slower than wired charging. Therefore, users prioritizing minimal downtime will favor the Doogee V20 Pro’s faster charging speed, even if the battery capacity is slightly smaller.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V20 Pro if you need a highly affordable, extremely durable phone with fast wired charging and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Motorola Defy 2 if you prioritize smoother performance for multitasking and gaming, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and are willing to pay a premium for a more modern chipset and potentially longer software support.