Doogee V20 Pro vs. Blackview BV9200: A Head-to-Head Rugged Phone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the Doogee V20 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, offers a more refined architecture than the Blackview BV9200’s 12nm Helio G96, translating to better thermal management during extended use. However, the BV9200’s 66W charging is a significant advantage for those needing quick top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V20 Pro | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 28 | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 01 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 170.5 x 81.2 x 14 mm (6.71 x 3.20 x 0.55 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 296 g (10.44 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 24 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Orange, Blue | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Doogee V20 Pro
- More efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speeds (33W)
- Display brightness data unavailable
- No wireless charging
Blackview BV9200
- Faster 66W wired charging
- 30W wireless charging support
- Brighter display (481 nits)
- Less efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Larger process node (12nm)
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 boasts a measurable 481 nits of peak brightness, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Doogee V20 Pro (brightness data unavailable). The BV9200’s 1423:1 contrast ratio also suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels given their market segment, the BV9200’s specifications indicate a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. The V20 Pro’s display specs are currently unknown, making a definitive comparison difficult, but the BV9200 clearly leads in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature multi-camera setups with a primary sensor. The absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it difficult to assess image quality. It’s likely both phones will include lower-resolution auxiliary cameras (e.g., macro or depth sensors) that offer limited practical benefit. The focus should be on the primary sensor’s capabilities, which remain unknown for both devices.
Performance
The Doogee V20 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a more efficient architecture than the Blackview BV9200’s 12nm Helio G96. While both CPUs feature the same core configuration – 2x Cortex-A76 and 6x Cortex-A55 – the smaller node size of the Dimensity 700 translates to lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling under sustained load. The Helio G96 prioritizes clock speeds (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the V20 Pro’s A76 cores) but sacrifices efficiency. This means the V20 Pro is likely to maintain higher sustained performance during gaming or video editing. The V20 Pro’s chipset is better suited for longer, more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV9200’s 66W wired charging is a clear advantage, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the Doogee V20 Pro’s 33W charging. The BV9200 also adds 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the V20 Pro. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speeds of the BV9200 mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently need to top up their phones will greatly benefit from the BV9200’s charging capabilities. The V20 Pro’s 33W charging is adequate, but slower.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V20 Pro if you need a rugged phone for consistently demanding tasks like navigation, data logging, or moderate gaming, and value long-term efficiency. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to quickly replenish the battery, and your usage is less consistently intensive.