Doogee V11 vs. Nokia XR20: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed and quick top-ups, the Doogee V11 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 and 65W charging offer a noticeable advantage. However, the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 and commitment to software updates make it a more sensible choice for those valuing efficiency and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V11 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 15 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 169.3 x 81.2 x 16.1 mm (6.67 x 3.20 x 0.63 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 340 g (11.99 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, infrared thermometer (surface temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 10W wireless Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 8500 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Red | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Doogee V11
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- Wireless and reverse wired charging support
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Software update commitment likely shorter than Nokia
Nokia XR20
- Guaranteed software updates from Nokia
- More efficient Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Clean Android experience
- Slow 18W charging
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details are missing, but assuming both utilize IPS LCD panels common in this segment, the display experience will be similar. The focus here is on ruggedness, not visual fidelity. Bezels are likely substantial on both to contribute to drop protection. Color accuracy will likely be standard for the price point.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus here isn't on flagship-level photography. Both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Dimensity 700’s ISP generally offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially giving the Doogee V11 an edge in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, but is not specified.
Performance
The Doogee V11’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a performance edge over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 (8nm). The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, provide a significant uplift in single-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 480’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 5G capable, the Dimensity 700 generally exhibits better modem performance. However, the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480 contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load. The V11 will likely excel in benchmarks, but the XR20 may maintain more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Doogee V11’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer in this segment, allowing for a full charge in under an hour. The Nokia XR20’s 18W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the V11 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The V11 also offers 10W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, features absent on the XR20, adding to its versatility. The XR20’s efficiency from the 8nm Snapdragon 480 may result in comparable real-world battery life despite potentially lower capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V11 if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming or frequent data transfer, and value the convenience of extremely fast charging. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a phone with a cleaner software experience, guaranteed updates, and a more balanced approach to performance and battery life, prioritizing reliability over peak speed.