Doogee V11 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Doogee V11 is the better choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, and the 65W charging is a game-changer. However, the Cat S62 Pro remains a solid option for those valuing a proven platform and potentially better software support.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V11 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 15 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 169.3 x 81.2 x 16.1 mm (6.67 x 3.20 x 0.63 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 340 g (11.99 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, infrared thermometer (surface temperature) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired 10W wireless Reverse wired | - |
| Type | 8500 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Red | Black |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Doogee V11
- Significantly faster charging (65W)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 700)
- Better thermal efficiency (7nm process)
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
- Long-term software support is uncertain
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand in the rugged phone market
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Proven reliability and durability
- Older, less powerful processor (Snapdragon 660)
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details on panel type and resolution are missing, but the focus here is durability. Both will likely feature toughened glass, but the real difference lies elsewhere. The absence of high refresh rates is expected in this segment, prioritizing battery life and robustness. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to accommodate the ruggedized design.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the processing capabilities of the Dimensity 700 in the Doogee V11 likely provide a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 ISP is adequate but lacks the newer features and optimizations found in the Dimensity 700. We can assume both will feature a primary camera, but the Doogee V11’s chipset gives it an edge in post-processing and computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee V11’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, offers a substantial advantage over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores provide significantly better single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 700 translate to a smoother overall experience. The 7nm node also implies better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 660, while capable, is showing its age and will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Doogee V11’s 65W wired charging is a standout feature, drastically reducing charging times compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s likely slower charging speed (spec not provided, but typical for the segment). While battery capacity isn’t specified for either, the faster charging of the V11 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The inclusion of 10W wireless and reverse wired charging on the Doogee V11 adds further convenience, features absent on the Cat S62 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V11 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like streaming, gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if fast charging is a priority. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a device from a well-established rugged phone brand with a focus on reliability and potentially longer software update support, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.