Doogee V10 vs. Ulefone Armor 11T 5G: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 11T 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Doogee V10’s Dimensity 700, despite the V10’s faster 33W charging. The Armor 11T’s superior processing power translates to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V10 | Ulefone Armor 11T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 02 | 2021, May 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 169.3 x 81.2 x 16.1 mm (6.67 x 3.20 x 0.63 in) | 163.8 x 81.6 x 14.2 mm (6.45 x 3.21 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 340 g (11.99 oz) | 293 g (10.34 oz) |
| - | IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~68.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, infrared thermometer (surface temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 45% in 30 min 10W wireless Reverse wired | 18W wired 10W wireless |
| Type | 8500 mAh | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Red | Black |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 590 EUR |
Doogee V10
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
- Likely lower multi-core performance
- Potentially less future-proof
Ulefone Armor 11T 5G
- More powerful Dimensity 800 chipset
- Superior multi-core performance
- Better for demanding tasks and gaming
- Slower 18W wired charging
- No reverse wired charging
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither Doogee nor Ulefone provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given the price bracket, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The real differentiator will likely be brightness and outdoor visibility, a critical factor for rugged phones. Without nit ratings, it's difficult to declare a winner, but the Armor 11T’s slightly higher price suggests a potentially better panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely employ similar image signal processors (ISPs) within their respective Dimensity chips. The quality will depend heavily on sensor size and lens quality, data not provided. We can assume both will offer acceptable performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will be the key differentiator, and without sensor details, it’s impossible to predict.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 11T 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm) represents a clear advantage over the Doogee V10’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). While both are 7nm chips, the Dimensity 800 features a quad-core Cortex-A76 setup clocked at 2.0 GHz, compared to the V10’s dual-core Cortex-A76 at 2.2 GHz. This core count difference, coupled with slightly higher clock speeds on the A76 cores in the 800, translates to better multi-core performance. The V10’s higher single-core clock speed is unlikely to offset the 800’s advantage in sustained workloads. This benefits users who engage in video editing, gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously.
Battery Life
The Doogee V10 boasts 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 45% charge in 30 minutes, alongside 10W wireless and reverse wired charging. The Ulefone Armor 11T 5G is limited to 18W wired charging and 10W wireless. While the V10 charges faster, the actual battery capacity of both devices is unknown. The faster charging is a significant benefit for users who frequently need to top up their phones quickly, but the Armor 11T’s potentially more efficient Dimensity 800 could offset the charging speed difference with better overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V10 if you prioritize faster charging speeds and a slightly more affordable price point, and your usage primarily revolves around basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. Buy the Ulefone Armor 11T 5G if you need a more powerful processor for demanding applications, gaming, or frequent multitasking, and are willing to trade a bit of charging speed for a more responsive overall experience.