Doogee V10 vs. Nokia XR20: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Doogee V10 is the better choice. However, the Nokia XR20’s more efficient chipset and commitment to software updates make it a more sensible long-term investment for those valuing reliability and sustained usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V10 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 02 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 169.3 x 81.2 x 16.1 mm (6.67 x 3.20 x 0.63 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 340 g (11.99 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~72.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, infrared thermometer (surface temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 45% in 30 min 10W wireless Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 8500 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Red | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Doogee V10
- Faster processor for demanding tasks
- Significantly faster wired charging (33W)
- Potential for better gaming performance
- Potentially lower battery efficiency
- Software update commitment likely shorter than Nokia
Nokia XR20
- More efficient processor for longer battery life
- Guaranteed software updates from Nokia
- Reliable and consistent performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor compared to the Doogee V10
- Slower wired charging (18W)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Details on panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing, but both are likely FHD+. The key difference lies elsewhere. The focus here is on ruggedness, not visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both to contribute to drop protection. Color accuracy is likely similar, geared towards practical usability rather than media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the XR20 will lean towards natural image processing, while Doogee often emphasizes vibrant, sometimes oversaturated, results. The absence of specific aperture details makes judging low-light performance impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit. The focus should be on the main sensor's capabilities, which are currently unknown.
Performance
The Doogee V10’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) offers a clear advantage over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, provide significantly more processing power than the Snapdragon 480’s Kryo 460 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. While the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 480 is more efficient, the architectural advantage of the Dimensity 700 outweighs this benefit in terms of raw speed. The V10 will likely exhibit less stuttering under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Doogee V10’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Nokia XR20’s 18W charging. The V10 can achieve 45% charge in 30 minutes, while the XR20 will take considerably longer. Both support 15W wireless charging, but the faster wired charging of the V10 is more practical for quick top-ups. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 480’s efficiency may allow the XR20 to achieve comparable or even slightly better battery life despite potentially having a smaller capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V10 if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, frequent video recording, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its Dimensity 700 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a phone that prioritizes battery life, consistent performance for everyday tasks, and guaranteed software updates, making it ideal for field workers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone seeking a dependable device.