Doogee V Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life and aren't demanding gamers, the Doogee V Pad is the clear winner. However, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE offers a more responsive experience thanks to its Exynos 1380 chipset and 45W fast charging, making it ideal for multitasking and content creation.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V Pad | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, B34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 279.5 x 175 x 8 mm (11.00 x 6.89 x 0.31 in) | 254.3 x 165.8 x 6.5 mm (10.01 x 6.53 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 572 g (1.26 lb) | 523 g or 524 g (1.15 lb) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) | 1440 x 2304 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.9 inches, 344.5 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8791 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 45W wired, QC2.0 |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Mint, Silver, Gray, Lavender |
| Models | - | SM-X510, SM-X516B |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.55 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 92:32h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class C (104 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee V Pad
- Exceptional battery life (92:32h endurance)
- High charge cycle count (800 cycles)
- Potentially more rugged design (implied by brand)
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful chipset (MT8791)
- Likely lower display quality
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
- Faster and more efficient chipset (Exynos 1380)
- 45W fast charging with QC2.0
- Likely better display quality
- Shorter battery life (implied)
- Potentially less durable build
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the market positioning, the Tab S9 FE likely boasts a higher resolution and potentially an LCD or AMOLED panel with a higher refresh rate. The Doogee V Pad, geared towards durability, likely features a more basic LCD. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for significant power savings. Bezels are likely larger on the Doogee, prioritizing screen protection.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Given the focus of the Doogee V Pad on durability, its camera system is likely a basic setup. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE, being a more mainstream tablet, likely features a more sophisticated camera module, though details are unavailable. Without sensor size or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It's safe to assume the Tab S9 FE will offer better image quality and more features.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE’s Exynos 1380 (5nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Doogee V Pad’s Mediatek MT8791 (6nm). The smaller fabrication node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with 4x Cortex-A78 and 4x Cortex-A55 cores, the Exynos 1380’s cores operate at a slightly higher clock speed (2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz on the Doogee’s A78 cores, though this is offset by the node difference). This means the Tab S9 FE will likely exhibit smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. The Doogee’s chipset, while capable, is geared towards efficiency rather than raw power.
Battery Life
The Doogee V Pad’s standout feature is its exceptional 92:32h endurance rating, coupled with an impressive 800 charge cycles, suggesting a long lifespan. However, its 10W wired charging is significantly slower than the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE’s 45W charging with QC2.0 support. While the Doogee excels in longevity, the Tab S9 FE can replenish its battery much faster. The difference in charging speed is substantial; a full charge on the Doogee will take considerably longer than on the Samsung.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V Pad if you need a tablet that can withstand harsh conditions, requires multi-day battery life between charges, and primarily handles basic tasks like media consumption and light productivity. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE if you prefer a smoother, more responsive user experience, value faster charging speeds, and engage in more demanding tasks like gaming or video editing.