Doogee V Max vs. Oukitel WP210: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP210 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset delivers a significant performance leap over the V Max’s Dimensity 1080, coupled with impressive battery longevity. However, the Doogee V Max remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V Max | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 13 | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.1 x 27.3 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 1.07 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 16 MP, f/2.2, 130˚ (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 45W wired |
| Type | 22000 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Classic Black, Moonshine Silver | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | About 60 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Doogee V Max
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks.
- Rugged design for durability.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the WP210.
- Slower charging speed (33W).
- Likely shorter battery life.
Oukitel WP210
- Significantly faster and more efficient Dimensity 8200 chipset.
- Faster 45W wired charging.
- Exceptional battery endurance (86:17h) and lifespan (1000 cycles).
- Likely higher price tag.
- May be overkill for basic smartphone users.
- Rugged design may add bulk.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the WP210's focus on premium features, it's reasonable to expect a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The V Max, likely targeting a more budget-conscious segment, may utilize a more cost-effective display solution. Bezels are likely comparable given the rugged design constraints of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the WP210’s positioning suggests a greater investment in camera hardware. While both phones likely feature multiple lenses, the WP210 is more likely to include a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The V Max will likely focus on providing a functional camera system rather than pushing the boundaries of mobile photography.
Performance
The Oukitel WP210’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Doogee V Max’s Dimensity 1080 (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to less throttling under sustained loads. The WP210’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 and 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – is more aggressive than the V Max’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup, promising faster application loading and smoother multitasking. This difference will be most noticeable in graphically intensive games and demanding productivity tasks.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP210’s reported 86:17h endurance and 1000 cycle lifespan are significant advantages. While the Doogee V Max’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 33W charging is slower than the WP210’s 45W wired charging. The WP210’s combination of a larger battery (implied by the endurance rating) and faster charging means users will spend less time tethered to a power outlet. The 1000 cycle lifespan also suggests a longer overall battery health retention, making the WP210 a more durable long-term investment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V Max if you need a dependable, rugged phone for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and prioritize a lower price point. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you demand the best possible performance for demanding applications, extended gaming sessions, and require exceptional battery life for multi-day use without frequent charging. The WP210 is for power users and those who rely on their phone in extreme conditions for extended periods.