Doogee V Max S vs. Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and exceptional battery endurance, the Doogee V Max S emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset provides a noticeable edge in processing power, while its impressive 146:58h battery life ensures all-day usability. However, the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s 66W charging and wireless charging capabilities offer a compelling alternative for those valuing rapid replenishment.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V Max S | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.1 x 26.3 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 1.04 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 536 g (1.18 lb) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0" | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | 22000 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Tarnish, Titanium | Black |
| Price | $ 269.99 / £ 659.23 / € 287.08 | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 146:58h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee V Max S
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 7050
- Exceptional battery endurance (146:58h)
- Long battery lifespan (1300 cycles)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Lacks wireless charging
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Faster charging (66W wired, 53% in 15min)
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially lighter weight (speculation based on chipset)
- Less powerful CPU (Helio G99)
- Lower battery endurance (unspecified)
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given the rugged focus, both likely utilize durable, scratch-resistant panels. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests a focus on practicality over premium visual experiences. Expect both to prioritize visibility in direct sunlight, a key requirement for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks specific camera details for either device. However, given the market segment, both are likely to feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality definitively. The absence of any mention of OIS suggests neither prioritizes advanced stabilization. Users should expect competent daylight photography, but low-light performance will likely be a limiting factor for both.
Performance
The Doogee V Max S boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This chipset represents a significant step up from the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7050 offer superior single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chips are built on a 6nm process, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 7050 provide a clear advantage in CPU-intensive workloads. The G99 is still a capable chip, but the V Max S will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Doogee V Max S shines with an impressive 146:58h endurance rating and a 1300 cycle lifespan, indicating exceptional longevity and sustained performance over time. While the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro doesn’t disclose endurance, its 66W wired charging capability is a major advantage, promising a 53% charge in just 15 minutes. The V Max S is limited to 33W wired charging. Furthermore, the Armor 17 Pro adds 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, offering greater flexibility. The trade-off is clear: the V Max S prioritizes sheer battery capacity and lifespan, while the Armor 17 Pro focuses on charging speed and convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V Max S if you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks like video editing or extended gaming sessions without significant throttling, and if long-term battery life is paramount. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you prioritize fast charging – both wired and wireless – and appreciate the convenience of reverse wireless charging for accessories, even if it means slightly less raw processing power.