Doogee V Max Pro vs. Motorola Defy 2: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and long-term battery health, the Doogee V Max Pro is the clear winner. Its exceptional 146:58h endurance and 1300 charge cycles significantly outweigh the Motorola Defy 2’s wireless charging convenience. However, the Defy 2 offers a more powerful chipset for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V Max Pro | Motorola Defy 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 23, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 19 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 20 | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.1 x 26.3 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 1.04 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 536 g (1.18 lb) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 22000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 570 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 146:58h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee V Max Pro
- Exceptional battery life (146:58h endurance)
- Long-term battery health (1300 charge cycles)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially less powerful chipset than the Defy 2
- No wireless charging
Motorola Defy 2
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 930)
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Significantly lower battery endurance
- No information on charge cycle longevity
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged focus, both likely employ durable glass like Gorilla Glass Victus. The Motorola Defy 2's inclusion of 15W wireless charging suggests a focus on convenience, potentially at the expense of peak display brightness to manage thermal constraints. The Doogee V Max Pro, with its emphasis on battery endurance, may prioritize power efficiency over absolute display fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the market segment, both phones likely prioritize practicality over cutting-edge camera technology. Expect capable main sensors for outdoor photography, but image processing will likely focus on accurate color reproduction and dynamic range rather than computational photography tricks. The absence of any mention of high-resolution sensors suggests neither phone is targeting camera enthusiasts.
Performance
The Motorola Defy 2 boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 930, featuring a 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 core configuration, while the Doogee V Max Pro utilizes the Dimensity 7050 with 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. While the 930 is a slightly older generation, its higher clock speeds initially suggest a performance advantage. However, the Dimensity 7050’s 6nm process node, compared to the 930’s also 6nm, could offer improved efficiency. Real-world performance will depend on thermal management, but the Doogee’s chipset has the potential to sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods. Both utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, meaning multi-tasking performance will be comparable.
Battery Life
The Doogee V Max Pro’s battery performance is its standout feature, achieving an impressive 146:58 hours of endurance and supporting 1300 charge cycles. This indicates a significantly larger battery capacity and optimized power management compared to the Motorola Defy 2. While the Defy 2 offers the convenience of 15W wireless charging, the Doogee’s 33W wired charging, coupled with its superior endurance, provides a faster and more reliable charging solution. The longevity promised by 1300 charge cycles is a major advantage for users who keep their phones for several years.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V Max Pro if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and you value long-term battery health. This is ideal for outdoor professionals, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Motorola Defy 2 if you prefer a more streamlined user experience with the convenience of wireless charging and need a bit more processing power for applications like video editing or graphically intensive games.