Doogee V Max Play vs. Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Rugged Smartphone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Doogee V Max Play is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Ulefone’s Helio G99. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T excels in charging convenience with its wireless capabilities and faster wired charging speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V Max Play | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.5 x 85.4 x 30.5 mm (7.22 x 3.36 x 1.20 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 683 g (1.51 lb) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (130 dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 10W reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 20500 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Tarnish | Black |
| Price | € 649.99 / $ 518.56 / £ 489.99 | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 192:26h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee V Max Play
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 7300
- Excellent battery endurance (192-26h)
- Long battery lifespan (1100 cycles)
- Slower wired charging (45W)
- No wireless charging
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Faster wired charging (66W, 52% in 30min)
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Established rugged phone brand
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G99)
- Potentially lower sustained performance
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The Ulefone, being a more established rugged brand, may have slightly better outdoor visibility due to optimized brightness settings. The lack of information on refresh rates or resolution makes it difficult to assess display quality further.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the chipset difference suggests the Doogee V Max Play will have a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The Helio G99’s ISP is adequate, but likely won’t match the capabilities of the Dimensity 7300. We can assume both phones will feature multiple cameras, but the V Max Play’s processing power will likely give it an edge in overall image quality.
Performance
The Doogee V Max Play’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The 4nm process node also translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better thermal management, reducing throttling during extended use. While the Helio G99 is a capable chip for everyday tasks, it will struggle with demanding games or resource-intensive applications compared to the V Max Play.
Battery Life
The Doogee V Max Play boasts an impressive 192-26h endurance and a 1100 cycle lifespan, indicating a focus on long-term battery health. While the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 66W wired charging (52% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless charging provide significant convenience. The V Max Play’s 45W wired charging is slower, but its exceptional endurance and cycle count suggest it will maintain capacity for longer. The 10W reverse wired charging on the Doogee and 5W on the Ulefone are both useful for topping up accessories, but not a primary charging method.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V Max Play if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its superior chipset and potentially better thermal management make it ideal for power users. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prioritize charging flexibility – wireless charging and faster wired speeds – and appreciate a more established brand reputation within the rugged phone space. It’s a solid choice for users who need reliable durability and convenient power-up options.