Doogee V Max LR vs Blackview BL8800 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Doogee V Max LR emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, delivers significantly improved performance and longevity compared to the Blackview BL8800 Pro’s Dimensity 700. While the BL8800 Pro offers a competitive price, the V Max LR’s superior processing power and battery endurance justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee V Max LR | Blackview BL8800 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2022, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2022, May 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 183.5 x 85.4 x 30.5 mm (7.22 x 3.36 x 1.20 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 630 g (1.39 lb) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, thermal assisted camera FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 2x Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes (130 dB) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 10W reverse wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 20500 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Tarnish | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 770 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 192:26h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee V Max LR
- Superior performance with the Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Longer battery life and 1100 charge cycles
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Likely better camera system due to higher price point
- Higher price compared to the Blackview BL8800 Pro
- Rugged design may add bulk
Blackview BL8800 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Competent performance for everyday tasks
- Rugged design for durability
- 33W fast charging
- Older and less efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- Shorter battery life and fewer charge cycles
- Potentially lower-quality camera system
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the V Max LR’s focus on overall performance, it’s reasonable to expect a higher-quality panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy. The BL8800 Pro, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a more cost-effective display solution. Bezels are likely comparable given the rugged design constraints of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a detailed comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Doogee V Max LR will likely feature a more advanced camera system. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over camera quality, but the V Max LR’s higher price point allows for potentially larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing. The BL8800 Pro will likely offer a functional camera setup suitable for casual photography, but may struggle in low-light conditions compared to the V Max LR. We can assume both will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, though the quality of the macro lens is likely minimal on both.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee V Max LR’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) represents a substantial leap over the Blackview BL8800 Pro’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 4nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning the V Max LR will sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, also outperform the BL8800 Pro’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications like gaming and video rendering. While both utilize a 6x Cortex-A55 cluster for efficiency, the overall architecture favors the Doogee.
Battery Life
The Doogee V Max LR boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, rated at 192 hours compared to an unspecified duration for the BL8800 Pro. Furthermore, the V Max LR’s battery is rated for 1100 charge cycles, indicating a longer lifespan. While the BL8800 Pro supports 33W charging (reaching 31% in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes), the V Max LR’s 45W charging offers faster replenishment. Both devices support 10W reverse wired charging, useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee V Max LR if you prioritize sustained performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and require exceptional battery life for extended use away from a power source. Buy the Blackview BL8800 Pro if you’re on a tighter budget and need a capable rugged phone for everyday tasks, prioritizing affordability over raw power and extended endurance.