Doogee U11 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Camera
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and a responsive user experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. However, if battery life is paramount and you need a phone that can last for days, the Doogee U11 Pro offers unmatched endurance, albeit with compromises in processing power and charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee U11 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 257.3 x 168.8 x 8.1 mm (10.13 x 6.65 x 0.32 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 537 g (1.18 lb) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~137 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7200 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0" | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 8580 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gray | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | - | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 131:38h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class C (104 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee U11 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (131:38h endurance)
- Potentially more durable build quality (Doogee's reputation)
- Long-term battery health (1000 cycles)
- Slow charging speed (10W)
- Outdated processor (Unisoc T7200)
- Likely inferior camera performance
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera quality (Google's computational photography)
- Powerful processor (Google Tensor G2)
- Faster charging (18W wired, 7.5W wireless)
- Significantly shorter battery life (76h)
- May require more frequent charging
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1070 nits, which translates to excellent visibility outdoors. While the Doogee U11 Pro’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. This brightness difference is crucial for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight. The Pixel 7a’s display technology, while not explicitly stated as LTPO, benefits from Google’s image processing and color calibration, offering a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, combined with its image processing algorithms, consistently delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 7a excels in both photo and video capture. The Doogee U11 Pro’s camera specs are not detailed enough to make a meaningful comparison, but given its price point, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image quality or feature set. The Pixel 7a’s focus on software optimization provides a significant advantage.
Performance
The Google Tensor G2 (5nm) chipset in the Pixel 7a represents a substantial leap in performance over the Unisoc T7200 (12nm) found in the Doogee U11 Pro. The Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.85 GHz, provides significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. The 5nm fabrication process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Doogee’s Cortex-A75 cores, while capable, are simply outmatched by the Tensor G2’s architecture. This difference will be most noticeable in app launch times, multitasking, and overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Doogee U11 Pro’s 131:38h endurance rating is truly remarkable, dwarfing the Pixel 7a’s 76h rating. This translates to potentially days of use on a single charge, making it ideal for travelers or users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets. However, the Doogee’s 10W wired charging is significantly slower than the Pixel 7a’s 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging. While the Doogee excels in longevity, the Pixel 7a offers more convenient and faster charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee U11 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last for multiple days on a single charge, and you don't heavily rely on demanding applications or gaming. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a best-in-class camera, a smooth and responsive user interface powered by Google's Tensor G2 chip, and faster charging capabilities, even if it means charging your phone more frequently.