The Doogee U10 and Motorola Moto E13 represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The U10 utilizes a Rockchip RK3562, while the Moto E13 opts for a Unisoc T606. This comparison will dissect the implications of these chipset choices and determine which device offers the better user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Motorola Moto E13 is the better choice. Its octa-core Unisoc T606, built on a more efficient 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Doogee U10’s quad-core RK3562. While both offer identical 10W charging, the E13’s superior processing power justifies its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, September | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 245.3 x 163.3 x 9.9 mm (9.66 x 6.43 x 0.39 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 514 g (1.13 lb) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~73.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | RK3562 | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5060 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Price | - | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
Doogee U10
- Potentially more rugged build quality (Doogee brand reputation)
- Simpler software experience (potentially)
- Lower price point (potentially)
- Less powerful RK3562 chipset
- Less efficient processor architecture
- Likely slower app loading times
Motorola Moto E13
- More powerful Unisoc T606 chipset
- Octa-core processor for better multitasking
- More efficient 12nm process
- Smoother user experience
- Potentially less durable build quality
- Slightly higher price point
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given their price points, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both are limited to standard 60Hz. The real differentiator will be color accuracy and peak brightness, which are difficult to assess without testing. Motorola generally calibrates its displays for reasonable color reproduction, potentially giving it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a meaningful comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially a depth or macro sensor. Given the price bracket, image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing. The absence of OIS on either device suggests low-light performance will be limited. The Unisoc T606’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but this is speculative without further data. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto E13’s Unisoc T606 is an octa-core processor built on a 12nm process, featuring two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores, also at 1.6 GHz. This configuration provides a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks and overall responsiveness compared to the Doogee U10’s RK3562. The RK3562 is a quad-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz, but its architecture is less efficient and lacks the performance cores found in the Unisoc chip. The 12nm process of the T606 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life under load. Users will experience faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Moto E13.
Battery Life
Both the Doogee U10 and Motorola Moto E13 support 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. A full 0-100% charge will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Unisoc T606’s superior power efficiency could translate to longer real-world battery life for the Moto E13, even with a similar capacity battery. The RK3562’s less efficient architecture will likely result in faster battery drain during intensive tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee U10 if you need a highly durable device and are willing to sacrifice some performance for potentially better build quality (based on Doogee’s brand reputation). It’s suitable for users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and very light app usage. Buy the Motorola Moto E13 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The E13 is ideal for users who want a phone that doesn’t feel sluggish during common operations.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Moto E13 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T606 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it can handle PUBG Mobile at lower graphics settings. Expect frame rate drops during intense action, but it's playable. The RK3562 in the Doogee U10 will likely offer a significantly less enjoyable gaming experience due to its weaker processing power.
❓ Is the 10W charging on either phone fast enough for daily use?
10W charging is slow by modern standards. Both phones will take approximately 2.5 to 3 hours to fully charge. This is acceptable for overnight charging, but inconvenient if you need a quick top-up during the day. Neither device supports fast charging technologies.
❓ How does the RK3562 chipset compare to other processors commonly found in this price range?
The RK3562 is generally considered to be less powerful than other chipsets commonly found in this price range, such as the MediaTek Helio G35 or the Unisoc T606. It prioritizes power efficiency over raw performance, making it suitable for basic tasks but struggling with more demanding applications.
