The Android tablet market offers a wide range of options, from budget-friendly devices focused on longevity to premium tablets prioritizing performance. We pit the Doogee Tab G6+ – a tablet emphasizing extended battery life – against the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4, a flagship contender boasting a powerful Snapdragon processor and rapid charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds, and the 67W charging drastically reduces downtime. However, the Doogee Tab G6+ provides exceptional battery endurance for users who prioritize longevity over raw power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2022, August 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 256.9 x 168.4 x 8.3 mm (10.11 x 6.63 x 0.33 in) | 285 x 185.2 x 6.7 mm (11.22 x 7.29 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 528 g (1.16 lb) | 620 g (1.37 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~243 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~81.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 445.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7280 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MIUI Pad 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 60% in 36 min, 100% in 68 min |
| Type | 8000 mAh | Li-Po 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Purple | Black, Silver, Green |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 400 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 88:26h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class E (52 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Tab G6+
- Exceptional battery life (88:26h endurance)
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term reliability
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower processor (Unisoc T7280)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 5G processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (60% in 36 min, 100% in 68 min)
- Likely superior display quality
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Doogee
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
While both tablets feature large displays, the specifics are missing. However, given Xiaomi’s history with high-quality panels, the Pad 5 Pro 12.4 likely boasts superior color accuracy and potentially a higher refresh rate. The larger screen size of the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 suggests a more immersive viewing experience. The Doogee Tab G6+ likely utilizes a standard LCD panel, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over advanced display technologies.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely a secondary consideration for both tablets, but the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 likely has a more capable camera system. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, Xiaomi typically equips its tablets with higher-resolution sensors and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Doogee Tab G6+ likely features a basic camera setup suitable for casual snapshots.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring a Kryo 585 CPU with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Doogee Tab G6+'s Unisoc T7280 (12nm). The Snapdragon 870’s smaller fabrication node (7nm vs 12nm) translates to greater power efficiency and significantly higher processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 870’s architecture, with its varied Kryo cores, is optimized for sustained performance, crucial for gaming and demanding applications. The Unisoc T7280, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with resource-intensive workloads.
Battery Life
The Doogee Tab G6+ shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 88:26h rating. While the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s battery capacity is unknown, its 67W wired charging is a game-changer. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 can reach 60% charge in just 36 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Doogee Tab G6+’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to fully recharge. The Doogee’s longevity is a benefit, but the Xiaomi’s rapid charging mitigates battery concerns for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Tab G6+ if you need a tablet primarily for media consumption, reading, or basic productivity tasks and value long-lasting battery life above all else. Its 88:26h endurance is ideal for travel or situations where access to power is limited. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 if you prefer a tablet capable of handling demanding applications, gaming, or multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a smoother, more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 in real-world tasks compared to the Doogee Tab G6+?
The Snapdragon 870 in the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 offers a substantial performance advantage. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive experience in demanding applications like video editing or gaming. The Doogee Tab G6+ will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with more intensive workloads.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 truly as fast as advertised?
Yes, the 67W charging is remarkably fast. Xiaomi claims 60% charge in 36 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes, and independent testing confirms these figures are accurate. This drastically reduces downtime and makes it easy to quickly top up the battery before heading out.
❓ Does the Doogee Tab G6+'s 1000 charge cycle rating guarantee the battery will last that long without significant degradation?
The 1000 charge cycle rating indicates the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its original capacity after that many full charge-discharge cycles. However, battery degradation is inevitable over time, and factors like charging habits and temperature can influence its lifespan. It's a strong indicator of durability, but not a guarantee of perfect performance after 1000 cycles.
