The Android tablet market is heating up, with options ranging from budget-friendly workhorses to premium productivity machines. We’re pitting the Doogee Tab E3 Pro, focused on exceptional battery endurance, against the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4, a flagship contender boasting a powerful Snapdragon processor and blazing-fast charging. This comparison will help you determine which tablet best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and quick turnaround times, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers a significantly smoother experience, and the 67W charging is a game-changer. However, the Doogee Tab E3 Pro excels in longevity, offering an impressive 89:58h endurance for those who value extended use between charges.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2022, August 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 302.1 x 197.5 x 8 mm (11.89 x 7.78 x 0.31 in) | 285 x 185.2 x 6.7 mm (11.22 x 7.29 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 718 g (1.58 lb) | 620 g (1.37 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~175 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~243 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.95 inches, 486.3 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 445.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 350 nis | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MIUI Pad 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF | - |
| Video | 1440p@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 20 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 60% in 36 min, 100% in 68 min |
| Type | 11000 mAh | Li-Po 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Gold | Black, Silver, Green |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 400 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 89:58h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (52 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Tab E3 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (89:58h)
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term reliability
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful processor (Helio G100)
- Limited display information suggests a cost-optimized panel
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 5G processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (60% in 36 min)
- Likely superior display quality
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Doogee
- Higher price point
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the Doogee Tab E3 Pro, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s large 12.4-inch screen is a key advantage. The Snapdragon 870’s image signal processor (ISP) likely supports a higher quality display panel. The Xiaomi’s 67W charging suggests a focus on a premium user experience, often correlated with display quality. The absence of detailed display specs for the Doogee suggests a more cost-optimized approach, potentially impacting color accuracy and brightness.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices. However, given the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s positioning as a flagship, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 870’s ISP is designed to handle higher-resolution sensors and advanced features like HDR video recording. The Doogee Tab E3 Pro likely utilizes a more basic camera setup focused on functional image capture.
Performance
The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) chipset represents a substantial performance leap over the Doogee Tab E3 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G100 (6nm). The Snapdragon 870’s Kryo 585 cores, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, offer significantly faster processing speeds for demanding tasks. The 7nm process node, while older than the G100’s 6nm, is optimized for performance in the 870, and the integrated 5G modem adds future-proofing. The Helio G100, while capable, is geared towards more mainstream usage, and its Cortex-A76 cores won’t match the Snapdragon’s sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Doogee Tab E3 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional 89:58h endurance, suggesting a highly optimized power management system. While the battery capacity is unknown, the longevity indicates efficient component selection and software tuning. However, the 18W wired charging is comparatively slow. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4, with its 67W wired charging, can reach 60% charge in just 36 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes – a massive time saving. This faster charging offsets any potential difference in overall battery capacity, making the Xiaomi more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Tab E3 Pro if you need a tablet primarily for extended media consumption, reading, or basic productivity tasks where battery life is paramount and you don't demand the highest processing power. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 if you prefer a tablet capable of handling demanding applications, gaming, and multitasking with ease, and if you value the convenience of incredibly fast charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How does the MediaTek Helio G100 handle graphically intensive games compared to the Snapdragon 870?
The Snapdragon 870’s Adreno 660 GPU is significantly more powerful than the Mali-G57 MC2 found in the Helio G100. Expect noticeably lower frame rates and graphical settings on the Doogee Tab E3 Pro in demanding titles like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty: Mobile.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 compatible with all USB-PD chargers?
The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 supports PD3.0 and QC4, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of USB-PD chargers. However, to achieve the full 67W charging speed, you’ll need a charger specifically rated for that wattage and supporting the appropriate Power Delivery protocol.
❓ Given the Doogee Tab E3 Pro's long battery life, will the battery health degrade significantly over time?
Doogee claims the battery supports 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health. While all batteries degrade over time, this specification indicates a higher level of durability compared to tablets with fewer rated cycles.
