The budget tablet market is heating up, with the Doogee Tab A9+ and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ vying for attention. Both aim to deliver a capable Android experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving that goal. This comparison dives deep into their specifications and performance to determine which tablet offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ emerges as the better choice. Its more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset, coupled with faster 15W charging, provides a smoother overall experience and quicker power-ups, despite the Doogee Tab A9+'s impressive battery endurance rating.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2023, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, October 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 257.3 x 168.8 x 8.1 mm (10.13 x 6.65 x 0.32 in) | 257.1 x 168.7 x 6.9 mm (10.12 x 6.64 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 644 g (1.42 lb) | 480 g or 492 g (1.06 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~137 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7200 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 8580 mAh | Li-Po 7040 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | Graphite, Silver, Navy |
| Models | - | SM-X210, SM-X215, SM-X216B |
| Price | About 140 EUR | $ 199.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.42 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 92:32h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class C (104 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Tab A9+
- Exceptional battery endurance (92:32h)
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful Unisoc T7200 chipset
- Slower 10W charging
- 12nm process less efficient
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Faster 15W charging
- 6nm process for better performance and thermal management
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Doogee
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. However, Samsung generally employs better color calibration and potentially higher peak brightness. The absence of details like resolution or refresh rate suggests a focus on cost-effectiveness over premium display features. Bezels are likely comparable, prioritizing screen real estate within a budget.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the budget nature of both tablets, camera quality is unlikely to be a primary differentiator. Both will likely feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots and video calls. We can assume both will have a main and potentially an ultrawide or depth sensor, but image processing will likely be the deciding factor, where Samsung typically holds an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), built on a more modern and efficient 6nm process. This translates to better performance per watt compared to the Doogee Tab A9+'s Unisoc T7200 (12nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a performance advantage over the Doogee’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the Samsung. The 6nm process also implies better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use.
Battery Life
The Doogee Tab A9+ claims a remarkable 92:32h endurance and 800 charge cycles, suggesting exceptional longevity. However, endurance doesn't equate to quick replenishment. Its 10W wired charging is significantly slower than the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+'s 15W charging. While the Doogee might last longer on a single charge, the Samsung will get back to full power much faster. The 6nm Snapdragon 695 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the Doogee’s larger battery capacity in real-world usage scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Tab A9+ if you prioritize maximum battery life and are willing to accept slightly slower performance. This tablet is ideal for users who primarily consume media and need a device that can last through long flights or extended periods away from a power outlet. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ if you value a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and the established ecosystem of Samsung's software and support. This is the better option for students, casual gamers, and anyone who wants a tablet that feels snappy and modern.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T7200 in the Doogee Tab A9+ struggle with demanding games?
The Unisoc T7200 is a capable processor for everyday tasks and light gaming, but it will likely struggle with graphically intensive titles at higher settings. Expect to lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops in demanding games. The Snapdragon 695 in the Samsung Tab A9+ offers a noticeable performance boost for gaming.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Doogee Tab A9+ with its 10W charging?
With 10W charging, a full charge from 0% will likely take between 4-6 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is considerably slower than the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+'s 15W charging, which should complete a full charge in around 3-4 hours.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ support 5G connectivity?
Yes, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 chipset in the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ includes integrated 5G modem, allowing for faster download and streaming speeds where 5G networks are available. The Doogee Tab A9+ does not appear to support 5G.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on each tablet?
Storage options are not specified in the provided data. However, based on market trends, both tablets likely offer configurations ranging from 32GB to 128GB, with microSD card support for expandable storage.
