The budget tablet market is heating up, with the Doogee Tab A9 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ vying for attention. While both aim to deliver an affordable tablet experience, they take distinctly different approaches to performance and longevity. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which tablet offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Doogee Tab A9’s Unisoc T310, despite the Doogee’s impressive battery endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2023, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, October 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 242.5 x 160.9 x 9.7 mm (9.55 x 6.33 x 0.38 in) | 257.1 x 168.7 x 6.9 mm (10.12 x 6.64 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 512 g (1.13 lb) | 480 g or 492 g (1.06 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~75.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T310 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 7040 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | Graphite, Silver, Navy |
| Models | - | SM-X210, SM-X215, SM-X216B |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 199.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.42 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 92:32h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class C (104 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Tab A9
- Exceptional battery life (92:32h endurance)
- Long-term battery health (800 charge cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly weaker processor (Unisoc T310)
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
- Lack of 5G connectivity
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
- Faster and more capable processor (Snapdragon 695)
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Better multitasking and gaming performance
- Shorter battery life compared to Doogee Tab A9
- Potentially higher price
- Charging speed is only marginally faster
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly high-end display, but details are lacking for the Doogee Tab A9. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ likely features an LCD panel, typical for its price range. The focus here is on functionality over fidelity. The absence of information regarding the Doogee’s panel type makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Samsung’s larger screen size and potentially higher brightness (based on Samsung’s display expertise) give it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are positioned as budget devices, and image quality will likely be adequate for casual snapshots. Without specific sensor details for the Doogee Tab A9, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms generally offer a more refined experience, even with similar hardware. We anticipate both tablets will struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Doogee Tab A9’s Unisoc T310 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695’s octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) provides a noticeable boost in both single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Doogee’s quad-core setup (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The 6nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits users who engage in gaming or demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Doogee Tab A9 shines in battery endurance, boasting a remarkable 92:32h rating. While the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+’s battery capacity is not specified, its more powerful chipset and 15W charging will likely result in shorter battery life. However, the faster charging speed (15W vs 10W) on the Samsung partially mitigates this difference, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Doogee’s 800 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, a benefit for users planning to keep the tablet for several years.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Tab A9 if you absolutely prioritize maximizing screen-on time and are primarily using the tablet for basic tasks like reading, web browsing, and light video consumption. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ if you need a tablet capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and benefit from 5G connectivity, even if it means slightly shorter battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T310 in the Doogee Tab A9 struggle with multiple apps open simultaneously?
Yes, the Unisoc T310 is a relatively low-powered chipset. While it can handle basic multitasking, running several apps concurrently, especially resource-intensive ones, will likely result in noticeable slowdowns and lag. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ with its Snapdragon 695 is much better equipped for multitasking.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ support expandable storage via microSD card?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, Samsung tablets typically offer microSD card support for expandable storage. This is a significant advantage for users who plan to store a large amount of media or files on their tablet, as it allows them to supplement the internal storage capacity.
❓ How does the 10W charging on the Doogee Tab A9 impact the user experience?
10W charging is relatively slow by modern standards. Expect a significantly longer time to fully charge the Doogee Tab A9 compared to the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+’s 15W charging. While the long battery life mitigates this somewhat, users who frequently need to top up their battery may find the slower charging speed inconvenient.
