The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, and the Doogee Tab A9 Pro and Nokia T10 represent compelling options for users seeking affordable Android experiences. While both tablets aim for accessibility, they diverge in their core hardware choices, particularly in their chipsets and CPU configurations. This comparison dives deep into these differences to determine which tablet delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and multitasking, the Nokia T10 emerges as the better choice. Its octa-core Unisoc T606 chipset provides a noticeable advantage over the Doogee Tab A9 Pro’s quad-core T310, despite both being fabricated on a 12nm process. However, the Doogee Tab A9 Pro boasts impressive battery endurance, making it suitable for extended use away from a power outlet.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2022, August 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 242.5 x 160.9 x 9.7 mm (9.55 x 6.33 x 0.38 in) | 208 x 123.2 x 9 mm (8.19 x 4.85 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 512 g (1.13 lb) | 375 g (13.23 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~75.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 360 nits (typ), 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T310 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.65µm |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 5250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | Ocean Blue |
| Models | - | TA-1503, TA-1472, TA-1462, TA-1457 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 92:32h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class C (104 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Tab A9 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (92:32h endurance)
- High charge cycle count (800 cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Quad-core processor may struggle with multitasking
- Unisoc T310 chipset is less powerful than the T606
Nokia T10
- Octa-core processor for smoother performance
- Unisoc T606 chipset offers better multitasking capabilities
- More responsive user experience
- Battery life likely shorter than the Doogee Tab A9 Pro
- 10W charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
Neither Doogee nor Nokia provide display specifications beyond the tablet's overall size. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut coverage suggests neither tablet is geared towards content creation or HDR video consumption. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget positioning. Without further data, a direct comparison is impossible, but the display is unlikely to be a deciding factor for most buyers.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided in the context data, and given the target market, it’s reasonable to assume both tablets feature basic camera setups. Focusing on megapixel counts would be misleading without knowing sensor size and lens quality. Image processing is likely to be minimal on both devices. Therefore, the camera is unlikely to be a key differentiator between these two tablets.
Performance
The Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55), represents a significant architectural advantage over the Doogee Tab A9 Pro’s Unisoc T310 (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). While both chips are built on a 12nm process, the T606’s additional cores, particularly the six Cortex-A55 cores, will improve multi-tasking and background processing. The Doogee’s single high-performance core may offer a slight edge in single-threaded tasks, but the Nokia’s overall CPU configuration provides a more balanced and responsive experience. The T606’s GPU is also likely to offer better graphics performance, making it more suitable for casual gaming.
Battery Life
The Doogee Tab A9 Pro shines in battery endurance, boasting a reported 92:32h of usage time and a claimed 800 charge cycles. This suggests a larger battery capacity and optimized power management compared to the Nokia T10, for which battery endurance data is unavailable. Both tablets utilize 10W wired charging, indicating relatively slow charging speeds. The Doogee’s longer endurance will be particularly beneficial for users who frequently travel or lack consistent access to power outlets. While the Nokia T10’s battery life is unknown, the more powerful chipset may consume more power during intensive tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Tab A9 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for long commutes, travel, or extended reading sessions and are willing to trade off some processing power. Buy the Nokia T10 if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means slightly shorter battery life. The Nokia T10 is better suited for users who frequently switch between apps or engage in light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T310 in the Doogee Tab A9 Pro struggle with demanding apps like video editors or large spreadsheets?
Yes, the quad-core Unisoc T310 is designed for basic tasks. While it can handle web browsing, email, and streaming, it will likely exhibit lag and slowdowns when running resource-intensive applications. The Nokia T10’s octa-core T606 is better equipped to handle these workloads.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Nokia T10 with its 10W charging?
With 10W charging, a full charge from 0% will likely take between 3-4 hours, depending on the battery capacity (which is not specified). This is a relatively slow charging speed compared to modern tablets with fast charging capabilities. The Doogee Tab A9 Pro will have a similar charging time.
❓ Is the 800 charge cycle claim for the Doogee Tab A9 Pro realistic, and what does it mean for long-term battery health?
800 charge cycles is a relatively high number and suggests the Doogee Tab A9 Pro utilizes battery technology designed for longevity. It means the battery is expected to retain a significant portion of its original capacity after being fully charged and discharged 800 times. However, battery degradation will still occur over time, even with a high cycle count.
